No special treatment here: "Oh, and there’s something else funded by Canadian taxpayers: Harems! Hundreds of GTA (Greater Toronto Area) Muslim men in polygamous marriages are receiving welfare and social benefits for each of their spouses."
America should follow suit - and keep letting in all the resource-sucking illegals. We will soon be in shambles, broke, impoverished and ruined like much of the rest of the world.
The quote above regarding polygamy in Canada is from an article about the fact that Canada has just approved Al-Jazeera television for its airwaves but has continually blocked applications from FOXNews. But, that situation may change eventually, since a Muslim owns a significant percentage of FOX and has previously taken glee in changing its programming to be less critical of Islam.
Al-Jazeera is called the "CNN of the Muslim World," so it is not considered "radical" or, rather, classically Islamic, as Islam is practiced in Saudi Arabia, for one example - the most important.
It should be noted that the "radicals" within Islam - i.e., the fundamentalists, who follow Islam to the letter - appear to be becoming more numerous than the so-called moderates, wherever they may be in the first place. Sharia law is already quickly becoming fashionable in Canada, as it has become in Europe. With our porous borders and lax laws, America is not far behind.
There is a word to describe a planned invasion and occupation of Dar al-Harb, the Lands of the Infidels: jihad. Canada is catering to jihadis, and we are the next target - as we have been for many years:
"The process of settlement is a 'Civilization-Jihadist Proecess' [sic] with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim's destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack."
- Mohamed Akram, Shura Council of the Muslim Brotherhood, 1991
Not long ago, the United States successfully prosecuted fundamentalist Mormon cult leader Warren Jeffs for "arranging extralegal marriages," among assorted other sexist and misogynistic behavior such as sex with minors. Will the U.S. have the guts to take on the Islamists? Or will it allow increased lawlessness, but only for the "tiny minority?"
-
|2010-05-16 22:23:20 AnonymousAcharya, can you build a good case that Mohamed Akram's views are an accurate reflection of the views of immigrants of muslim background? Similarly, can you show that immigrants, and not those who wield real power, are or will be responsible for the u.s. being "in shambles, broke, impoverished and ruined like much of the rest of the world"? Threshing up anger against the outsider is an ancient political manipulation technique, as I'm sure you're aware. I too am deeply unsettled by the rise of neo-fundamentalism, muslim and christian alike; but you do yourself and your views no benefit by letting your emotions get the better of you.
-
|2010-05-17 14:25:38 Acharya SThank you.
"you do yourself and your views no benefit by letting your emotions get the better of you. "
You mean, like people who write knee-jerk remarks on other people's blogs? Next will you use the sexist term "hysteria?"
What I have outlined above - being quite calm so that I could actually write intelligible sentences and post them to my blog - was what is surely destined for our future if things continue this way.
If you cannot see that clearly, step aside and allow others a view.
-
|2010-05-18 18:58:03 AnonymousNot a knee-jerk reply; I meant it precisely. Sexist? No. Women have no monopoly on letting their emotions get the better of them! In fact, that's the condition of most of humanity. See Plato's Republic about that...
I have the greatest respect for you and your writings; they have proved very useful to me in discussions with religious and the quasi-religious, and helped me dispel the last of my doubts about my rejection of organized religion. I look to you (perhaps unfairly) as a liberator, a disseminator of the truth. A voice of reason.
So I ask again, in all respect, if your statement here-
"America should follow suit - and keep letting in all the resource-sucking illegals. We will soon be in shambles, broke, impoverished and ruined like much of the rest of the world".- is based on reason, or on emotion. Can you show a rational case that immigrants are or will be responsible for our economic woes, or that every immigrant of islamic background agree with and can be held responsible for the statements of certain radical islamic clerics?
-
|2010-05-18 20:48:55 Acharya SSo I answer again, it's based on LOGIC, as that will be the LOGICAL end of certain policies, such as are occurring right now and we can see with our own two eyes. There's nothing mysterious about it that required this time-consuming exchange. Do you really need to read studies in books to see what is happening all around you? Is that a sensible way to exist?
-
|2010-05-23 10:52:30 Acharya SYes, the proof is called "HISTORY." You really don't know the history of the world where "illegal immigrants" - i.e., INVADERS - have destroyed other cultures? Ever heard of Pizarro or Cortez? Columbus? That's just for starters and only in the "New World." The Old World has had constant "illegal immigrations" - INVASIONS - for millennia.
Where's the proof? It's everywhere people have migrated. How about the Old Testament descriptions of the "illegal immigrants" in the lands of Canaan? The conquest of Jericho? The slaughter of the Midianites by Moses, who was just an "illegal immigrant."
As concerns "legal immigration," Europe is paying plenty for it, and their lands are being destroyed. Here's just ONE example:
Immigration costs Dutch €100 Billion
And here's another article specifically about the U.S. and illegal immigration:
Dark side of illegal immigration: bankrupting America
It's really quite simple - your inability to comprehend this issue has nothing to do with "proof," obviously.
-
|2010-05-18 19:44:04 PennyQuote:"Can you show a rational case that immigrants are or will be responsible for our economic woes...."
A recent article on ILLEGAL immigration into the USA
But yes subsidize the poor huddled masses letting them breed indiscriminately, as the communists/socialists/communitarians would have you do to build their army for them. While your life and future are burned away, HMM I suppose there is some truth to religious tripe may be we had paradise 'heaven' and are turning it into hell!?!? Time for a change:
1. Breeding is no longer a right but to be done with care and no one under 115 I.Q. gets to, with a few exceptions those still living a tribal life on the land as they were meant to can have small communities but those who think they are entitled to what they have not paid into do not get sh*t
2. No more taxes your property is to be allodial and you will be responsible for growing your own food and or trading other goods services to obtain it, as the Articles Of Confederation out lined.
3. No more investment banking or speculation trading of stock/bonds as a matter of fact no more stock market. And corporations/Governments have no rights at all, only human beings have rights.
4. No more self proclaimed royalty or public religious institutions, if you want to have faith in anything other than yourself fine, just keep it in your own home. Therefore no more charities or 501c entities if you wish to give, give if not so what. No more govenment/religious control over schooling or science. No more huge chemical/military industry many things can be made from natural sources that are easily renewable and would last a life time.
I could go on for days but it will more than likely never happen, ever most are too stupid to see forest for the trees!