Freethought Nation

presented by Acharya S and Truth Be Known, online since 1995

Home Contributing Writers Acharya S/D.M. Murdock Is Jesus obsolete? Christians debate the need for a savior

Is Jesus obsolete? Christians debate the need for a savior

E-mail Print PDF

There has been much debate of late about whether the biblical Adam and Eve were "real people" or myths. A number of Christian scientists, for example, have conceded that DNA studies cast serious doubt on the biblical account of Adam and Eve, indicating that the story is indeed mythical. Obviously, most nonbelievers would tend to agree with that honest and logical assessment.

However, this apparent fact of the biblical tale being a myth, rather than a "historical" account, opens up a huge can of worms, because, it is likewise admitted, there is no need for the saving grace of Jesus Christ if there was no fall in the first place, as depicted in the Genesis story of the Garden of Eden. No "original sin," no need for salvation - that's the simple equation. If God is behind it all, why would "he" need to come to Earth as his own son to die for our sins, if Genesis isn't factual?

This dilemma is playing out in numerous arenas, including among the Baptists, as described in the article below. I blogged this debate earlier, in a post entitled, "Adam and Eve a myth?," and I've been writing about this subject for decades. In my book The Christ Conspiracy, published in 1999, I included rational and scientific research dating back centuries that demonstrates the Adam/Eve and Garden of Eden story to be an ancient myth found in various permutations in other cultures besides the Jewish one. Indeed, the Pygmies of the Congo have a similar story that may represent a very ancient forerunner of these others.

As I wrote in Christ Con (188), it has been declared repeatedly over the centuries that without the concept of the original fall/sin of man and his expulsion from the Garden of Eden, there would be no need for a savior or for the Christian religion. For example, "reformed" ex-Father Peter Martyr said:

Were this Article [of faith] be taken away, there would be no original sin; the promise of Christ would become void, and all the vital force of our religion would be destroyed.

The same debate occurred widely with the introduction of Darwinism in the 19th century, with the resulting complaint expressed in the American Quarterly Church Review (17.197):

If this hypothesis be true, then is the Bible "an unbearable fiction," fabricated during successive ages... If this hypothesis be true, then also have Christians, for nearly two thousand years, been duped by a monstrous lie...

In any case, the revelation of Adam and Eve as myths would tend to make the figure of Jesus Christ obsolete, much to the dismay of his many followers - maybe, just maybe, the unneeded savior too is mythical, based on the countless other gods and goddesses of the era?

"The denial of a historical Adam and Eve as the first parents of all humanity and the solitary first human pair severs the link between Adam and Christ which is so crucial to the gospel..."

Debate over Adam and Eve continues

Recent comments by a Southern Baptist seminary president that belief in a literal Adam and Eve is necessary to correctly understand Christ's saving work continues to prompt debate.

Brian McLaren, author of A New Kind of Christianity, linked recently in his blog to an Associated Baptist Press article headlined "SBC leader says much at stake in debate over Adam and Eve." McLaren described quotes attributed to Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary as "recycling of the Scopes Monkey Trials in Christian higher education."

Mohler said in the story that without a literal Adam and Eve "we will have to come up with an entirely new understanding of the gospel meta-narrative and the Bible's storyline."

"I firmly agree (in an ironic sort of way) with the good Dr. Mohler," McLaren commented. "I think the conventional Constantinian 'understanding of the gospel meta-narrative and the Bible's storyline' is wrong, misguided, and dangerous. We do in fact need 'an entirely new understanding' -- new, that is, compared to the status quo, but actually more ancient and primary than the conventional approach....

...In his 2010 book, A New Kind of Christianity, McLaren explicitly denies that the Bible reveals Adam as a historical figure. He also denies that we should believe in a Fall into sin that leads to a divine verdict against sinful humanity."

Mohler said debate over whether Adam and Eve were historical figures has served to "clarify, once again, what is at stake."

"The denial of a historical Adam and Eve as the first parents of all humanity and the solitary first human pair severs the link between Adam and Christ which is so crucial to the gospel," Mohler concluded. "If we do not know how the story of the gospel begins, then we do not know what that story means. Make no mistake: a false start to the story produces a false grasp of the gospel."...

Further Reading

The Christ Conspiracy: The Greatest Story Ever Sold
Suns of God: Krishna, Buddha and Christ Unveiled
Who Was Jesus? Fingerprints of The Christ
Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection
Jesus as the Sun throughout History
The Christ Conspiracy Articles
Comparative Religion Articles
Christ Myth Forum Posts

Comments (2)
  • Tartarus
    Excellent points.
    It is indeed surprising that while many Christians have long since conceded that the Adam and Eve story is fictitious, they continue to insist that the Jesus Christ story is infallibly true.
  • doug  - Mr.
    I live in South Carolina and I'am a born again believer. First off I feel sorry for you and pray for you that God will open those eyes of yours before it;s too late and you end up in Hell. I know you do not evan have a clue how I am but I asure you sir that God is real and the evil one is too. I had an encounter were he basically told me choose today whom you will serve with the bright light above and the evil satanic silowet in the corner. I choose Jesus and how sweet my life is, O sir I strongly urge you or evan dare you just see for yourself and see and that unbelief will diminish. It's so easy just want to have the encounter with God and want to change and turn from your sin's and believe in your heart. I love you father God and I know you sent your son to die for me forgive me and come into my heart, I know that your son gave his all for us and you rose him up. Now he is alive forevermore at the right hand of the father just waiting to be dispatched to come again to receive his chosen. I want to further say I love you and I'am praying God will open your eyes and heart to himself. God Bless :)
Add comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
 
Author of this article: Acharya S
Banner
Join Our Mailing List
Your Name:
Your Email Address:
Subscribe Unsubscribe

Search across all of Acharya's websites

Christ in Egypt

What people are saying about Acharya S/D.M. Murdock

"Your scholarship is relentless! ...the research conducted by D.M. Murdock concerning the myth of Jesus Christ is certainly both valuable and worthy of consideration." —Dr. Kenneth L. Feder, Professor of Archaeology, Central Connecticut State University, Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience In Archaeology

"I find myself in full agreement with Acharya S/D.M. Murdock... I find it undeniable that...many, many of the epic heroes and ancient patriarchs and matriarchs of the Old Testament were personified stars, planets, and constellations..." —Dr. Robert M. Price, The Pre-Nicene New Testament

"I can recommend your work whole-heartedly!" —Dr. Robert Eisenman, James the Brother of Jesus and The New Testament Code, RobertEisenman.com

"Well-referenced, with numerous quotations from renowned Egyptologists and classical scholars, Acharya's penetrating research clearly lays out the very ancient pre-Christian basis of modern Christianity. Those who espouse Christianity beware! After digesting the evidence, you will never again view your religion in the same light." —Dr. Robert M. Schoch, Professor of Natural Science College of General Studies at Boston University; Author, Pyramid Quest, Voyages of the Pyramid Builders and Voices of the Rocks

"Acharya S deserves to be recognized as a leading researcher and an expert in the field of comparative mythology, on a par with James Frazer or Robert Graves—indeed, superior to those forerunners in the frankness of her conclusions and the volume of her evidence." —Barbara Walker, The Women's Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets and Man Made God

"I've known people with triple Ph.D's who haven't come close to the scholarship in Who Was Jesus?" —Pastor David Bruce, M.Div, North Park Seminary, Chicago, HollywoodJesus.com

"Thirty years ago, when in divinity school, I might have had second thoughts about becoming an Episcopal priest if a book like D. M. Murdock's Who Was Jesus? had been available to me." —Bob Semes, Retired university professor of History and Religion, Founder and Executive Director of The Jefferson Center

"In addition to presenting in Suns of God the troubling history of religious wars in an easily followed narrative, Acharya goes a step further, explaining as only she can how a once-simplistic idea has been carried into our modern world with terrible and nearly unimaginable results." —Rev. Dr. W. Sumner Davis, Fellow, Royal Astronomical Society; Member, American Geophysical Union; Affiliate, New York Academy of Science

"Ms. Murdock is one of only a tiny number of scholars with the richly diverse academic background (and the necessary courage) to adequately address the question of whether Jesus Christ truly existed as a walking-talking figure in first-century Palestine." —David Mills, Atheist Universe

"Thank you, Acharya, for the important work you are doing. Who Was Jesus? Fingerprints of the Christ just might be the best short introduction to Biblical scholarship yet." —David Bergland, 1984 Libertarian Party Presidential Candidate, Libertarianism In One Lesson

"...I have found her scholarship, research, knowledge of the original languages, and creative linkages to be breathtaking and highly stimulating." —Rev. Dr. Jon Burnham, Pastor, Presbyterian Church, Houston, TX

"Acharya S has done a superb job in bringing together the rich panoply of ancient world mythology and culture, and presenting it in a comprehensive and compelling fashion." —Earl Doherty, The Jesus Puzzle

"Acharya S is a shining light of truth in a sea of deceit." —Rob McConnell, X Zone Radio/TV, Ontario, Canada

"The Christ Conspiracy—very, very scholarly and wholly researched—is a book for today..." Rev. B. Strauss, ex-Catholic Priest, Chicago, IL

"Amidst the global chaos of George Bush's War on Terror, largely founded on religious intolerance and simplistic notions of good and evil, Acharya S is the voice of reason." —Joan D'Arc, Paranoia

"D.M. Murdock could well be the most brilliant, insightful and rigorous theologian writing today." —Robert Tulip

"Acharya S is the ranking religious philosopher of our era." —John K.

"Acharya S/Murdock deserves an award for her hard work and courage. She is the Galileo of our day!" —Charles Johnson

"Acharya S knows more about the ancient Mysteries than any living scholar." —Christopher Knowles

"Acharya S is an amazing researcher with a tremendous amount of energy and appetite for constant discovery of newer horizons. " —Dr. O.P. Sudrania

Gospel According to Acharya S

FTN Books

Login Form

Related Items of Interest


Share this Page

| More

We rely on word of mouth to help us grow!

Acharya's Web 2.0

acharya s facebook account
acharya's twitter account
acharya's myspace account

Donate to the Cause!

donations for acharya s

Kindle Ebooks

Jesus as the Sun throughout history

The ZEITGEIST Companion Guide image

man made god by barbara g. walker

2010 Astrotheology calendar

freethought nation animated banner