Freethought Nation

Now this man is intelligent and concise,( " win the hearts and minds" and he showed tolerance where it deserves! it's terrible that sharia law is allowed in court/ legal proceedings in the U. K. A Muslim group here in America is trying to get the same. It got bounced out but they still trying. I see the future of America in this video, a grim possibility ,,, but for now separation of church and state is the law of the land, barely. Beliefs of all people are sacred things and not to be taken lightly. Just like the man in this video points out, it is a manual for those who would make it so,, sooo keep it around to show the masses so they might understand the truth and realize the fact that naysayers against Muslim extremists are not lying about this stuff! My hat is off to these people who speak with wisdom , and thank you Acharya ,for once again putting out the good information so saps like me don't starve due too indigestion of stupidity- peace

beliefs of all people aren't to be taken lightly, but "sacred", seriously? Most beliefs aren't based on any sort of evidence, so, if mental illness and delusion are sacred, so be it, I guess. Religion is really nothing more than a way to express insanity on a daily basis witout getting locked up.

Here's your sign( sorry,couldn't resist )
Main Entry: sa·cred
Pronunciation: ˈsā-krəd
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from past participle of sacren to consecrate, from Anglo-French sacrer, from Latin sacrare, from sacr-, sacer sacred; akin to Latin sancire to make sacred, Hittite šaklāi- rite
Date: 14th century
1 a : dedicated or set apart for the service or worship of a deity b : devoted exclusively to one service or use (as of a person or purpose)
2 a : worthy of religious veneration : holy b : entitled to reverence and respect
3 : of or relating to religion : not secular or profane
4 archaic : accursed
5 a : unassailable, inviolable b : highly valued and important
— sa·cred·ly adverb
— sa·cred·ness noun
Do any of these definitions suit? maybe 4 or 5?
If not, I'm sorry for this post. - peace

Of Islam being the lowest common denominator ideology on the planet. Just a scant, few years ago, I would have never even listened to, much less associated myself, even in my mind, with the likes of the EDL or any other right wing ANYTHING. But, I see my once fellow "liberals", simply losing their minds over Islam. Not that many, many duplicitous conservatives aren't doing the same thing. I mean, is sucking up to Islam the liberal party line now? What is it about Islam that makes once simply open minded people utterly deaf, dumb, blind and retarded? What happened to observation of evidence and basing conclusions on such? What is it going to take for Americans to wake up before it's too late? Must we have a 9/11 in every city, homicide bombers on your street and your daughters being raped and used as prostitutes? America has absorbed many pathogens and continued to function essentially unimpeded; the mafia, for example. But, Islam cannot be absorbed. It is a pathogen which kills the host. Denial of the facts will not change this.

The indigenous people in England are in serious trouble. When I say "trouble," I'm referring to what could end up being their very own extermination, that is, their extinction. The method being used to accomplish this genocidal goal is the flooding of Europe with massive numbers of non-Europeans (Muslims and others).

The non-Europeans (Muslims) are playing the part of ammunition which is being fired at the English and which will, in the long run, either kill off the English, or at least disable their ability to forcefully resist any demands made by the individuals who are firing the ammunition.

If the Muslims are the Ammunition, then who is the Shooter and who is the Gun?

Once we determine who the Gun and the Shooter is, we have to ask why it is that the Shooter feels a need to shoot all those Muslim Bullets at the indigenous English people in their own country.

The Shooter, whoever it may be, must, for some reason, feel very much afraid of the European people. The rapid fire technique that the Gun is using to spray Muslim Bullets all over Europe makes me think that the Shooter is extremely afraid of the European people.

So why is this Shooter so extremely fearful of the European people?

Thirty years ago in England and the rest of Europe, there was not much that the Shooter was afraid of. Why? Because the Shooter confidently knew that it controlled very tightly the flow of news and information throughout Europe and North America; especially, and particularly, news and information that was about itself, the Shooter.

Around 1992 - that's about twenty years ago - the Shooters began to hear about how a thing called a computer had the potential to spread (any) kind of news and information by just about anyone to just about anywhere instantaneously. Which means that the computer enabled anybody anywhere to learn about the Shooter. The computer ruined the Shooter's privacy.

So the Shooter started thinking about ways in which the spread of information about themselves could be stopped. The Shooter decided that restricting freedom of speech could become a testy issue so they skipped that idea. Destroying freedom of speech could really anger the folks out there and would amplify the information that the Shooter was trying to keep quiet. So, again, they skipped the idea of squelching freedom of speech.

The Shooter then got really creative and decided that it would be easier to eliminate the people who were exercising their freedom of speech than it would be to eliminate the principle of speaking freely.

Now the Shooter had to figure out a way to eliminate the people who were speaking freely but without angering them and without causing them to speak even more freely and louder than usual.

So the Shooter invented something called Multi-Culturalism and their media preached to the people how cool and loving it was to be Multi-Cultural. The Shooter quitely had the fences that surrounded Europe removed and that began the inflow of the Muslim Bullets that would soon be shooting the European people. But in the beginning the Shooter's media made the people think that looking at a Gun loaded with Muslim Bullets pointed at them was cool and loving. The curious, seafaring English fell for it.

But the Shooter had another worry that they wanted to eliminate. GUNS!!! Guns in the hands of anyone other than the Shooter really worried them. If, by chance, in the future, the English would suddenly wake up to fact that those millions of Muslim Bullets staring them in the face were really not cool and loving, those English might reach for their own guns and, with anger, reverse the bullet count.

Twenty years ago in England there were tons of guns in the hands of the English. How now, wonders the Shooter, can millions of free speaking Englishmen be convinced that turning in their tons of guns is a cool and loving thing to do? Easy! You make the English people hate a horrible catastrophe that involved guns.

Along came the Dunblane school massacre. And, yes, they soon turned in their guns.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunblane_school_massacre

The turning in of their guns after the Dunblane school shooting reminds me of how Americans were convinced that it was cool and patriotic to join the military to fight terrorists in Iraq after 911 happened. 911 and Dunblane. Someone should write a book called "911 and Dunblane: How To Stir Fervor."

Today the English are staring down the barrel of the Shooter's Gun that's loaded with Muslim Bullets - cheap, run-of-the-mill Muslim Bullets. And all the English Defense League has is a microphone.

The disarming of the English people could lead to their extinction.

If the English had their guns right now, all the Muslims would be sailing or running back to the Middle East right now.

The Gun is the Euro lawyers and politicians who opened the borders to the Muslims.

The Shooter? I don't believe it's the British Royalty.

There's a few things you might want to see:

www.conspiracyking.com/ringofpower
"Ring of Power" by Amenstop Productions

http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_13457
"Solving 911 The Original Articles" by Christopher Bollyn

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKULTRA
Wikipedia: Project MKULTRA

http://www.ae911truth.org/
ae911truth.org

The same thing happened in Australia and they turned in their guns.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Arthur_massacre_(Australia

The same thing happened in Stockton, California but the USA has its Second Amendment and its NRA (National Rifle Association).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_School_massacre

There is also the by now tiresome irrationality by Muslims regarding the Palestinian question,Check out:

"Hear this Great,Scholarly Interview about the Palestinians being an Invented People:Jamie Glazov,Daniel Pipes and David Meir-Levi"

http://www.antisharia.com/2011/12/27/hear-this-greatscholarly-intervie w-about-the-palestinians-being-an-invented-peoplejamie-glazovdaniel-pi pes-and-david-meir-levi/

AND ALSO

"Cisneros of Spain(1436-1517),Man of Contradictions and False Saint"

http://www.antisharia.com/2012/06/10/cisneros-of-spain1436-1517man-of- contradictions-and-false-saint/

The EDL are a nasty bunch. They are tolerated, encouraged even, as politically useful in that they are a great tool for the 'divide and conquer' ideology, they are useful in distracting the population from actual political realities like increasing economic inequality and the rise of oligarchy in the UK.
The EDL and groups like them, promulgate a mish-mash of truths, half truths, outright lies and exaggerations.
They were founded by former football hooligans frustrated by the crackdown and removal of tribalist football violence. They provide a quasi-legitimate outlet for racist attitudes.

A few hometruths:
- sexual abuse of children (and women) is fostered by theocratic interference in people's sexuality by religious power hierarchies. This occurs where christianity lays down sexual laws just the same as with islam. It's not just an islamic-related problem, look at the Vatican!
- sharia law in the UK operates socially within many muslim communities. In this context it is used as an arbitration service to defuse familial and social disagreements over money, business etc It is not about putting burkas on women or chopping people's hands off or killing non-muslims
- the economic contribution of asian derived communities to the wider UK economy is vast, tens of billions of pounds
- extremist muslims are no more or less unpleasant than christian extremists (or jewish/Israeli nationalist extremists for that matter)

There are indeed many unpleasant and criminal people within muslim or asian communites in Britain. The police and the law are there to prosecute them.
The same is true of white working class communities.
Some of the worst (biggest) crimes are perpetuated by the (mostly white) upper classes who exploit, tax-avoid, defraud, sell arms etc. It is these people who use their powerful political influence to encourage extremist groups like the EDL so that large swathes of the poorly educated are distracted from the fact that they are being ripped off by the rich.

Posting videos like the one above (10 seconds was enough for me!) gives oxygen the the embers of hatred, racism, xenophobia and violence that keeps the working class and the poor divided, distracted, ignorant and frustrated. It's what the oligarchs want.

I obviously disagree. What the EDL is doing has obviously proved itself necessary, since the government agencies haven't been doing anything to protect the citizens.

Are there hooligans among the EDL? Yes, but the rest of what you are saying constitutes a smear job, as far as I can tell. You didn't even watch the video, so you don't know what is going on in it. What they are doing is very valuable, and your remark here simply shows your naivete and lack of knowledge of the subject matter: "The police and the law are there to prosecute them." The police and the law haven't been doing anything - have you not paid attention? As you said, you didn't even bother to watch the video, and it's clear you have not been paying attention.

The rest of your remarks constitute the typical lefty liberal party line - much of which is utterly false and which in itself is stoking the fires of Islamic fundamentalism. When you blithely use the words "neo-Nazis" and "hatred, racism, xenophobia and violence" you reduce their value and lose credibility. Your apathy and objection to the common people stopping these child-rapists is exactly what the oligarchs want.

Only one way to stop this is to allow the re-arming of the British people.
They have the right and duty to protect themselves from this brutal mooslim onslaught. Then if they see this happening in their neighborhood they can then easily deal with the problem then and there. Nothing like a few dead mooslim rapists shot while caught in the act to put a damper on it.
It sure a hell won't happen here in the states..... we know how to protect ourselves from vicious criminals and have no compunction about using a gun against any kind of criminal caught in the act.
England is fast going down the tubes and unless they act quickly, there will be no more Britain. The people need to wake up and insist the government begin deporting alll mooslims back to the hell hole they came from.