Freethought Nation

The phrase ΜΗΚΟΣ ΠΕΡΙΦΕΡΕΙΑΣ ΚΥΚΛΟΥ means "length of the circle's circuit" has a lexarithm of 2294. The word ΔΙΑΜΕΤΡΟΣ means diameter and has a lexarithm of 730.
2294/730 gives a quotient of 3.1424657534 which is the π in the circle!!!!

ΜΟΝΑΣ (one point) has a lexarithm of 361. If you make a sum of the digits sequentially (361 -> 3+6+1=10 -> 1+0 =1) you take the number 1 as you can see! The same happens with ΕΝ (one) which has a lexarithm of 55.
If you do the same with ΔΥΑΣ (605) and ΤΡΕΙΣ (615) - you take 2 and 3 in
correspondence!!
ΕΛΛΗΝ (Hellen, the genarch of the Greeks) has a lexarithm of 123!

The same with what mentioned above happens with ALL the letters of the Hellenic language. For example Α+Λ+Φ+Α = 1+30+500+1 = 532 -> 5+3+2=10 ->1+0= 1. So the sequential sum of the lexarithm digits of the full name of a letter, give the number the letter corresponds to!!!! This happens with all the letters!!! Personally I checked it only with A though, using the programme I posted before.

The worlds ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΣ (human) and ΦΥΣΙΣ (nature) have the same lexarithm which is 1310!

The world ΤΙΝΑ has a lexarithm of 361 and the world ΑΝΤΙ has the same lexarithm, and it's natural as they have the same letters (everything exists, has its opposite). No Greek word was invented in an accidental way.

Note that the combinations are so many, that coincidence in most parts isn't possible.

I wanna add something else , extremely interesting.....

ΤΟ ΕΝ ΔΕΛΦΟΙΣ ΜΑΝΤΕΙΟΝ = Ο ΟΜΦΑΛΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΣΜΟΥ
TO EN DELPHOIS MANTEION = O OMPHALOS TOU KOSMOU
THE ORACLE IN DELPHOIS = COSMOS'S OMPHALOS (NAVEL)

This equation is true... BUT
For many decades now the only people who tried to understand the ancient civilizations, where the archaeologists. These people were and are irrelevants of understanding. I will give you an example:
Since ancient years it was known that the Delphois Oracle was the center of the world. Right? Right.... so the archaeologists supposed that ancient Hellenes thought that the world had its center in that oracle.Right? Wrong!
The Oracle was something like a X-Y-Z starting point , a datum. Everyone who wanted to establish a city, seeked an advice there. And of course the oracle didnt get the answer from Apollon, but they were specialists in giving the position of the new cities. Have you ever seen some ancient sculptured stones like phallus (excuse me but the word in english is dick)? Those stones are everywhere in the world and they were xyz starting points.
The potisions of ancient hellenic cities are on the perimeter of cycles with the oracle as center, and there are many cities with the same range from the oracle .
I know it because I have seen a research about it and afterall I am a Land Surveyor. We had a course of Urban Planning and the method of establishing villages,cities or biomechanical zones around a main city was exactly the same cyclic as our ancestors did.

"To the first category belongs the theorem popularly associated with the name of Pythagoras (c. 540 B.C.), connecting the square on the hypotenuse or diagonal of a rectangular triangle with the sum of the squares on the sides containing the right angle. Perhaps the first statement of this theorem in its most general geometrical form is ancient India's most important contribution to the development of mathematics. It is true that most ancient peoples knew and used the right triangle 3,4,5 for getting a right angle (The Chinese Nine Sections, c. 1100 B.C., mentions this triangle and the Kahun Papyrus of Egypt, c. 2000 B.C., refers to four sets of numbers forming right triangles, source: D.E. Smith. History of Mathematics, Vol. II, p. 293) and the Babylonian records contain a list of Pythagorean numbers (O. Neugebauer, The Exact Sciences of Anquiquity, p. 35). But the full geometrical significance of the theorem, that the sides of any right-angled triangle will exhibit this relationship amongst them, was perhaps first realised by the altar-building Vedic priests. The German mathematicians A. Burk and M. Cantor discuss the question in detail and come to the conclusion that the theorem was known in India at the latest by the 8th century B.C. i.e. the date of the oldest Sulbasutra that, of Baudhayana. The samhitas of the Black Yajur Veda and the Satapatha Brahmana give 36 units the lenght of the praci (east-west line) or prsthya (the line of symmetry) of the Mahavedi and 30 units as one of the north-south sides, the praci and half the side thus making the sides containing the right angle in a rational right angled triangle, viz. 36,15,29. In the Satapatha Brahmana (X. 2.3.7) mention is found of increasing the size of the Vedi fourteen-fold to accomodate the Ekasatavidhagni (the fire place for the 101st performance of the sacrifice) for which operation a knowledge of the theorem of the square of the diagonal is indispensable. Hence it is highly probable that the theorem of the square of the hypotenuse was known in India much earlier than the Sulbasutra period. Tentative evidence for a very much earlier date even can be brought forward, if the term trisadhastha (residing in three abodes) as applied to the fire, has reference to the three agnis, Garhapatya, Ahavaniya and Daksina, because the construction of the Daksinagni requires a knowledge of this theorem. Though the Sulbasutras themselves speak only about the orientation of the 3 fires, the commentators supply the mode of construction, which involves drawing a square with the dvikarani of a pisila (the pisila is a unit of lenght defined variously as the arm with folded palms or the lenght of the two arms extended) as the side.
The Sulbasutras exhibit a thorough familiarity with the properties of the right triangle, or rather the properties of the sides and diagonals of figures with right-angular corners. Many rational right triangles are mentioned, like: 15,36,39 (Ap. Sl. V. 2; B.Sl. I.49); 3,4,5 (Ap. Sl. V. 3; B.Sl. I.49) and the latter multiplied by 4 and 5: 5,12,13 and 12,35,37 (Ap. Sl. V.4; B. Sl.I. 49); 7,24,25 (B. Sl. I. 49); [...] This was preliminary to the construction of all the altars and fireplaces described in the Vedic literature. But it is only Katyayana and Manu that give the details of the procedure. Baudhayana and Apastamba take the praci or east-west line for granted. [...] "Fixing a pin (or gnomon) on level ground and drawing a circle with a cord measured by the gnomon, he fixes pins at points on the line (of the circumference) where the shadow of the tipo of the gnomon falls. That is the praci." (K. Sl. I. 2) (The Manava Sulbasutra (p.2) gives the same method). This is the direction for fixing the praci, which is therefore the line joining the tips of the shadows of equal lenght cast by an object in the forenoon and afternoon. This method of fixing the east-west line is given in the Tantrasamuccaya and other works on architecture and the Tantra works dealing with the constraction of mandapas (sheds or halls) and kundas (sacred fire-pits). [...] Such arcs themselves are used to draw two perpendicular diameters in a circle in Baudhayana's recipe for drawing a square: "Drawing a line one fixes a pin at its middle. Slipping the end ties on to this pin, one draws a circle with the mark (the middle mark of the cord) ajnd fixes pins at the ends of the diameter. With the end-tie on the eastern pin one draws a circle with the whole cord. Similarly at the western pin. The second diameter should be stretched through the points where these (circles) intersect" (B. Sl. I. 22-25). This method is well-known in later Indian mathematics as the 'fish' method, the name being based on the fact that the lenticular portion common to the two intersecting circles has roughly the shape of a fish."

A 12 angul Shanku when erected on a plain ground gives a shadow on to the ground due to sun at various times at a given place. This shadow is known as Shankuchaya. [...] Here chaya is important in knowing both prashna lagna and timings. What is chaya? In olden days Astrologers used to have a stick 12 angul erceted in the house and year long shadow markings for various hours at various months were marked. This is impractical in todays times. So without erecting shanku [stick] can we find the chaya. Chayakarna² = Chaya ² + Shanku ². Then Chaya ² = Chayakarna ² – Shanku ². This principle can be found in Grahalaghav, Sarvanandkaran, Makarand, etc. treatises of Astrology. Vishuvat is sayan mesha sankranti and Sayan tula sankranti normally falls on 21 march and 23 september. On these days at NOON, 12 angul shanku at whatever place gives the shadow , that shadow is known as PALABHA. At Vishuvat rekha ie akshansha 0° deg at equator shadow will be zero. As we go northwards or southwards the shadow increases so does Palabha proportional to lattitudes. that means if akshansha is known [ longitude /lattitudes] then plabha can be known. and vice versa. If shadow is accurately cast then lattitudes and longitudes of the place can be found out.

In the anti-catholic Rosicrucian texts, written by freemasons like Bacon, they promised to stop this elitism somewhere (but they still haven't):

"Jehova will redeem humanity by revealing those secrets which he previously reserved only for the elect. [...] The whole world shall become as one book and all the contradictions of science and theology shall be reconciled." - source: Confessio Fraternitatis (1614)

So perhaps in their minds there was no need to allow the majority access to high knowledge and having an elite system of knowledge preservation would be essential while approaching the end of the Great Year in the age of Aries and the dark ages that would follow along into the age of Pisces.