Freethought Nation

presented by Acharya S and TruthBeKnown.com, online since 1995

It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 11:52 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:10 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:41 pm
Posts: 738
Hello, I will present a paper on Blavatsky and the Great Year at a conference on Theosophy to be held at Sydney Universityby the Sydney Society for Literature and Aesthetics in early October.

So far I have just prepared the following abstract, and would welcome any help.

Blavatsky and the Great Year: Astrology in the Bible: The Great Year is the nearly 26,000 year long period of precession of the equinox around the zodiac, caused by the wobble of the axis of the earth. Discussed by Madame Blavatsky in The Secret Doctrine, and by other modern mystics such as Carl Jung in his book Aion, the Great Year provides a unifying cosmic framework for the esoteric wisdom of the perennial philosophy, summarized in the axiom `as above so below'. This paper analyses references in the Bible to show how the Great Year underpins Theosophy as a discipline that bridges theology, astrology and science, pointing to a new philosophical synthesis for a New Age.

Thanks

Robert Tulip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:22 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:41 pm
Posts: 738
Full Paper as delivered: http://rtulip.net/yahoo_site_admin/asse ... 701138.pdf

Blavatsky and the Great Year: Astrology in the Bible
Robert Tulip

Dedicated to the memory of David Hume, patron saint of Sydney University.

Abstract: The Great Year is the 25,765 year long period of precession of the equinox around the zodiac, caused by the wobble of the axis of the earth. Discussed by Madame Blavatsky in The Secret Doctrine, and by other modern mystics such as Carl Jung in his book Aion, the Great Year provides a unifying cosmic framework for the esoteric wisdom of the perennial philosophy, summarized in the axiom ‘as above so below’. This paper analyses references in the Bible to show how the Great Year underpins Theosophy as a discipline that bridges theology, astrology and science, pointing to a new philosophical synthesis for a New Age.

1. The Great Year
William Butler Yeats, in A Vision, said that before embarking on his study of the Great Year of the Ancients he had not imagined that anyone had tried to explain history philosophically. Such a project is precisely what HP Blavatsky attempts in The Secret Doctrine. The goal of Blavatsky’s effort is to provide cogent and compelling intellectual foundations for the paradigm shift that our world is now going through, towards an understanding of the Great Year as the true horizon of time.

The consequence of this paradigm shift for Biblical studies is to read the Bible as primarily cosmic allegory rather than as literal description of supernatural events. As per TS Kuhn’s theory of the structure of scientific revolutions, the new emerging cosmic paradigm of the Great Year has high explanatory power for the real meaning of religious texts, while the old paradigm of orthodox faith is collapsing beneath its many anomalies.

The earth’s axis wobbles with a period of about 25765 years, a stable astronomical cyclic period known as the Great Year. Moving very slowly in reverse along its annual path, the sun precesses in its apparent annual galactic position against the zodiac by one degree of arc every 71.6 years. Over the course of each Great Year, the sun inscribes the precessional circle of the Ages of the Zodiac at the equator as shown in the temporal model above, while the axis of the earth inscribes the precessional circles at the North Celestial Pole and the South Celestial Pole. There have been nearly 200,000 Great Years since the dawn of life on earth four billion years ago.

Traditionally also known as the Platonic Year, this regular movement of the seasons against the stars is caused by the gravitational torque of the sun and moon on the ‘spare tyre’ around earth’s equator, and is the physical basis of the division of time into twelve Ages, including the now ending Age of Pisces and the dawning Age of Aquarius. These Ages are periods 2147 years in length, one twelfth of the Great Year, aeons that are said to encompass and explain broad themes of human cultural evolution. Carl Jung discusses these themes in his essay Aion, where he comments that “through the precession of the equinoxes, the spring-point moves into this sign [of Pisces] and thus inaugurates an age in which the "fish" was used as a name for the God who became a man, who was born as a fish and was sacrificed as a ram, who had fishermen for disciples and wanted to make them fishers of men, who fed the multitude with miraculously multiplying fishes, who was himself eaten as a fish, the "holier food," and whose followers are little fishes.” (92) Building on these insights, we can see that the present shift of Ages marks the symbolic theme of the shift in human consciousness from belief to knowledge as a guiding principle.

Here we see the path of the equinox point along the ecliptic over the Great Year, illustrating the slow movement of the spring point over recorded history.

The foundation of these concepts is in physics, not magic. This paper explores the Great Year as the natural framework of Biblical eschatology, against the writings of HP Blavatsky. Analysis of the Great Year provides a method to bridge faith and reason and thereby reconcile science and religion. The high spirit of theosophy, with its insights into the wisdom of God, is grounded in the slow cyclic patterns of the Great Year, providing a basis to restore the secret doctrine of true religion at the heart of the perennial philosophy as the basis of human salvation.

Setting the Great Year as the framework for the emerging new paradigm, we see that our planet is now reaching the end of the Age of Pisces. This slow movement of the annual perceived position of the sun against the galaxy provides the basis for a paradigm shift as great as the Copernican heliocentric revolution, through a new synthesis of the old supernatural thesis of religion and its modern natural scientific antithesis. The structure of the Great Year, shown in the diagrams above, enables us to consider space-time in its true four dimensional reality, seeing the three dimensions of space against the fourth dimension of duration, understood at planetary scale.

The BC/AD moment of the birth of Jesus Christ is the turning point of time, the alpha and omega point of the Great Year, providing a direct cosmic correlation for Christian beliefs. The equinox reached the alpha-omega point of the zodiac at the time of Christ, crossing from Aries, the first sign of the zodiac, into Pisces, the last sign. If the Age of Pisces began at the year 0, the Age of Aquarius is due to start in the year 2147, providing a physical basis to interpret Biblical eschatology.

To further illustrate the physical process, the following star charts show the precession of the equinox since the Age of Leo in 10,000 BC, one frame per thousand years. The pictures show the position of the Sun at the northern spring equinox, with the line across the middle marking the shifting position of the celestial equator, the constant diagonal line from upper left to lower right showing the zodiac, and the other diagonal showing the galaxy drifting across. We see here, at both 4300 BC and 8500 AD, the chi-rho cross seen by Constantine, a theme that is also discussed by Plato in the Timaeus as the relation of the same and the different, the galaxy and the zodiac. The equinox reached the centre of the celestial chi-rho cross, slowly moving across the Milky Way, at the time that Judeo-Christian doctrine calls the fall from grace, about 4300 BC. The equinox point has since inscribed the Ages of Taurus, Aries and Pisces, and will soon move into Aquarius.

The Great Year: Position of the Sun at March Equinox
10000BC 9000BC 8000BC 7000BC

6000BC 5000BC 4000BC 3000BC

2000BC 1000BC 0 BC/AD 1000AD

2000AD 3000AD 4000AD 5000AD

6000AD 7000AD 8000AD 9000AD

10000AD 11000AD 12000AD 13000AD

14000AD 15000AD




2. The Secret Doctrine
Helena Blavatsky’s The Secret Doctrine is a major milestone of the human intellect. Reading this remarkable work today, with the advantage of more than a century of scientific progress since it was written, we can see an astounding genius of courageous vision, pointing a path to human enlightenment. A reading of The Secret Doctrine that focuses on the truth in it, and how Blavatsky contributes to a decisive shift in the paradigm of human knowledge, can show how it points us towards an understanding of the Great Year of the Ages of the Zodiac as the structure of time.

There are many ideas in theosophy where a speculative excitement races ahead of the available evidence, especially with Blavatsky’s sense that an objective validation of esoteric wisdom could emerge out of the ferment of science of her day. This leads her to argue for many ideas that with hindsight are wrong. Rather than dwelling on mistaken claims, my preference is to explore how Theosophy shows deep insight into the nature of reality and time, through comparison of the ideas of Madame Blavatsky with real empirical cycles of the earth, to find ideas that are entirely contestable and true against a modern objective scientific understanding.

Madame Blavatsky sets our intellectual horizon wider than our modern conventions, whose cradles are identified in Athens and Jerusalem. This effort to shake the temporal foundations of western thought is one reason she is vilified by dogmatic bigots, as she exposes the implicit racism within dominant cultural assumptions. Looking to how Western thought learnt from India and Egypt, theosophy opens the potential to solve some of the enduring mysteries of our planetary existence. Especially, I will argue, The Secret Doctrine helps us to see how the fragmentary wisdom of the Bible may be reconstructed as a coherent message. Our modern mentality sees European Greeks as the first thinkers, even though the Greeks themselves said Egypt and the Middle East were sources of ancient wisdom for them. Blavatsky helps us to move past the western children tossing pebbles into a pool to find the eastern reality of the pool itself.

Theosophy tells us there is no religion higher than truth. To this end, HP Blavatsky asks us to look through the actual words to find their real but hidden meanings. Therefore, when we read her descriptions of cycles of billions of years, and of realms of existence above the material, ideas that do not appear correct, we should consider these as allegories for concepts that are compatible with empirical observation. When Blavatsky discusses human civilizations lasting for hundreds of thousands of years before recorded history, we can reasonably look to the scientific record, especially modern DNA analysis, to suggest her speculation was in error. However, science does tell us that the human brain has been its current size for at least 50,000 years, since the great migration out of Africa. We do not know much of what people thought about for the first 45,000 years of this long time. It is quite reasonable to speculate that astronomers in India and Egypt spent thousands of years developing the foundations of our modern knowledge, foundations that have been made invisible by the cataclysms and upheavals of history.

Considering HPB as a guide, we can profitably read her as a pioneer on the path of truth, excavating the foundations of the Abrahamic beliefs to find the cosmic and historic ground beneath the popular myths. For example, Indian ideas of the day of Brahma lasting 4.32 billion years sit behind the temporal framework of the Bible. The long timeframe of the Manvantara should not be seen as literal, but as allegory for the real temporal cycle of the earth. Two zodiac ages together have an actual period of 4294 years, very close to the traditional estimate of 4320 years, one millionth of the traditional Day of Brahma. This traditional estimate links the Great Year to the sexagesimal temporal framework of Babylonian astronomy; for example there are 43,200 seconds in 12 hours. Multiplication by six and sixty scale up through the roughly six times sixty length of the year of about 360 days, to the six time six times sixty years of the Age period of about 2160 years, and the twelve ages of the Great Year forming the traditional period of 25920 years. We can readily imagine that ancient Indian astronomers made accurate calculations of the speed of precession, but these calculations were lost and corrupted into the Vedic imagination of billions of years.
When HPB refers to texts as ‘blinds’ she suggests the authors concealed their intent. I suspect that this concealment is also produced by the fact that, like Saint Paul, many of the esoteric authors look ‘through a glass darkly’, dimly perceiving an ultimate truth that they struggled to describe. Paul tells us that at the second coming of Jesus Christ we will see God face to face. HP Blavatsky is one of the prophetic giants on whose shoulders we can stand to begin to understand what Paul meant with this prediction.

If we consider the Great Year as the organizing principle for ancient thought, the references to billions of years, an inordinately long time, make sense if we see the Day of Brahma in the 25,920 year estimate of the Great Year, dividing the conventional period of the Day of Brahma by one million to produce the 4320 years conventionally seen as two ages of the zodiac.

3. References in the Bible to the Great Year
The alpha and omega symbolism provides an obvious correlation between the story of Jesus Christ and the cycle of the Great Year. The beginning and ending moment of the movement of the equinox from Aries to Pisces at the time of Christ was a central theme linking stellar observation with evolving religious consciousness. Other such obvious Biblical correlations with the stars include Gemini with the Cherubim guarding the path to Paradise; the wheels within wheels described by Ezekiel with the nested cosmic circles of the day, the year and the Great Year; the four creatures of Ezekiel and Revelation with the four fixed signs of the zodiac; the holy city of New Jerusalem with the Great Year; the twelve jewels with the twelve Zodiac Ages; the Milky Way with the River of Life, the Zodiac with the Tree of Life, Orion’s Belt with the three magi; Argo with the Ark and the manger; the loaves and fishes with the signs of Virgo and Pisces; Adam with the Age of Taurus; Abraham with the Age of Aries; Jesus Christ with the Age of Pisces; and the Second Coming of Jesus Christ with the Age of Aquarius.

To illustrate one compelling explanation of how the Bible encodes cosmic allegory that completely overturn traditional explanations, lets look now at Revelation 13:2: In a cryptic description of the events of the 3.5 years of tribulation, the Bible says "the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority." This text has long puzzled readers, with various attempts to match the story to human empires. Following the lead of Madame Blavatsky, we can instead look to see how the authors were presenting an old secret cosmic doctrine.

There is no leopard among the traditional constellations, but perhaps like the 5000 men of the loaves and fishes story we have here a reference to the spots of the leopard, ie the stars themselves. If we consider the bear of this story to be Ursa Minor, the current location of the North Celestial Pole, or Ursa Major, we also see the lion is Leo, and the dragon is Draco, as shown in the following diagrams.

In this diagram, showing the movement of the North Celestial Pole (the pole of the earth) around the North Ecliptic Pole (the pole of the sun) over the course of the Great Year, we see that over the Ages of Pisces and Aries the pole has precessed anti-clockwise through the Little Bear, Ursa Minor, and for Ages before that the pole precessed through the Dragon, Draco. If we consider the quarter of a Great Year roughly since 4294 BC as the time of the fall, we see that for the two thousand years of the Age of Taurus, the pole was still in the constellation of the dragon, while for the last four thousand years, through the Ages of Aries and Pisces, the north pole has been in the constellation of the bear. The north ecliptic pole, the central point of this star chart at the dragon’s foot, is the spot around which the celestial pole rotates over the period of each Great Year. In 2788 BC the pole star was Thuban in Draco, and in 12,200 BC, in the time some call the Golden Age, the pole star was Vega in Lyra. By the end of the Age of Aquarius in 4294 AD the north celestial pole will have precessed to reach the crown of Cepheus.

To briefly mention a typical resonance with other mythology, a reading of this shift of the pole against the story of Jason and the Argonauts can see Jason stealing past the protecting dragon to get the Golden Fleece as his reaching back in time through the age of the dragon to the golden age when Vega was the Pole Star.
Zooming out to set the north ecliptic pole against the zodiac and the Milky Way, we have the following sky clock, again with the north celestial pole moving anti-clockwise around the diagram once per Great Year. Here we see the zodiac nodes at left and right where the ecliptic crosses the celestial equator, into tropical Aries/ sidereal Pisces on the left and into tropical Libra/sidereal Virgo on the right side.

The Milky Way bisects the sky. Considering the Great Year cycle like a Day of Brahma, with day and night over one Great Year rather than the 4.32 billion years of tradition, we have dawn and dusk of the cosmic day of the Great Year at the moments when the equinoxes cross the Milky Way, at the top and bottom of the picture, midnight at the left, with the equinox in Pisces and Aquarius, and midday at the right, with the equinox in Leo and Virgo.
We may say from this analogy that the dragon, ie the Age of Taurus when the North Pole was in Draco, gave his power and seat and authority to the Bear/Lion/Leopard, ie the Ages of Aries and Pisces when the Pole has traversed Ursa Minor.

Against the imagery of the bear and lion in Rev 13:2, we clearly see Leo and Ursa Major as the upper and lower stars observed in the sky at the time of the fall in 4294 BC at the dawn of the Age of Taurus. The Dragon Draco has passed his seat as lode star to the beast with mouth of a lion and feet of a bear and starry spots of the leopard. Revelation 12:3-4 says “another sign appeared in heaven: an enormous red dragon ... His tail swept a third of the stars out of the sky.” In 10750 BC the poles aligned to Eltanin, the nostril of the dragon Draco. We see here the dragon whose tail sweeps one third of the stars of the sky. For one third of the Great Year, and one third of the sky, the pole precessed through Draco, finally moving into the little bear in 1650 BC, when the dragon gave the bear-lion his seat as described at Revelation 13:2.

These comments have just scratched the surface of the astrotheological reading of the Bible that is possible through building on the powerful insights of The Secret Doctrine. Madame Blavatsky points out repeatedly that the effort to see mythic and stellar themes in Christianity has been suppressed but is central to true understanding. As we now move towards a change of the zeitgeist, we may hope that the spirit of the age will become more receptive towards dialogue about the real meaning and basis of human spirituality.

Robert Tulip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 5:18 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 2247
Location: Everywhere
Nice to see everything put together with the secret doctrine in mind. Blavatsky was clearly informed on the astrotheology of ancient peoples, which has passed down as a secret doctrine of sorts. And it is evident that the secret doctrine is mixed into Revelation, drawing from many an Egyptian theme given through Christianized Gnosticism, basically. It was rather ironic that after I read this post I went over to my girlfriends grandma's house to help mow the grass and had walk out on the lawn and remove two signs advertising the upcoming Revelation seminar here in this little Adventist town. On the signs were images of the leopard, dragon, lion, and bear. Needless to say I had a good laugh.

_________________
The Jesus Mythicist Creed:
The "Jesus Christ" of the New Testament is a fictional composite of characters, real and mythical. A composite of multiple "people" is no one.

The celestial Origins of Religious Belief
ZG Part 1
Jesus: Hebrew Human or Mythical Messiah?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:00 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:41 pm
Posts: 738
Hi Tat, I’m quoting here from your comment in the Zep Tepi thread. This discussion mixes together material from several threads, so I hope it is okay to continue it here.
Tat Tvam Asi wrote:
I don't get that Robert [that theosophists would not respond to discussion of the Great Year]. I would think that the theosophists have enough background to easily understand a presentation like this about the Great Year and the Bible.
My sense is that we are up against three conflicting and mutually hostile paradigms - science, Christian religion and astrology. A new Aquarian paradigm has to find the truth in each of these, and so will be seen as unacceptable by all their dogmatists. Theosophy is a sort of amalgam of the three, but is rather tired as a pre-WW2 tradition with some unacceptable racial ideas that did not survive in the public realm after the perverted use that the Nazis made of such mystical thought – hardly surprising when Blavatsky’s symbol combined the Star of David and the swastika!

Science, following Hume, Carnap and Popper, says we should ignore as meaningless everything that does not emerge directly from observation and mathematics. Christianity holds to literal faith in the historical Christ and sees any doubt about this brainwash story as Satanic. Astrology has its own traditions that operate like sects in emotional conflict with the wider world, only accepted by the wider community as a form of fictional entertainment, but lacking means to link its internal coherence to modern knowledge.

The argument I have presented about Revelation draws equally from science, Christianity and astrology, and is therefore equally unacceptable to each. I have referenced the Great Year vision against Blavatsky because her agenda was to unite a vision of reformed science and religion against the old framework of Vedic wisdom, albeit that she made some large mistakes in drawing her sweeping canvas. This whole area of thought is these days automatically and instantly dismissed as the domain of cranks and crackpots. Mainstream consensus sees analysis of the Great Year as pointing to socially dangerous ideas with potential to disturb the liberal relativist consensus that tolerates all belief as equally fictional, as seen in Popper’s critique of Plato. Overall, this all means it is difficult to find entry points that will open up a discussion. The only academic I have found who might be interested is Gary Trompf, who also gave a paper at the Blavatsky Conference at Sydney University.
Quote:
We'll have to see what comes of the jcf audience over time, but for now it’s slow. There's more action in the Conversation With A Thousand Faces forum though, so you may want to post something there and see what sort of responses come from it. The mythology and religion section is a bit more slow paced. Maybe we need to spend some time at an astrology forum. Do you have any active threads going on right now on an astrology forum?
My experience with astrologers is mostly that the evidence based method I propose is of no interest to them because it sits uneasily against their more free ranging intuitive approach. My interest in finding cyclic meaning in the Bible touches emotional buttons that they find distressing, often because of conflict they have had with the church. I have links with a group called objective astrology founded by David Cochrane, but I seem to have accidentally pushed some wrong buttons there too.
Quote:
No matter the current action on the paper, you did a good job of illustrating the points. I've said before that I was quite literally born into an environment surrounded by the Beast and Dragon symbolism of Revelation. They are currently running a Revelation seminar about this very Dragon and Beast imagery this next week, according to the promotional signs people have been posting on their front lawns. I'm not frightened off by Daniel and Revelation at all because I've seen this imagery from as far back as I can remember and it's been extremely mysterious the entire time. The explanations I've received have all been unsatisfactory. I just want to get a firm grip on what it all actually is, not what people assume it to be.
You are not frightened off Tat, but then if I recall correctly you are still the only person other than me who has commented on the substance of the argument. We still struggle to find any mainstream forum where these simple ideas of astrotheology can get a hearing.
Quote:
So what I see when looking at the star charts is something in the way of a progressive Revelation seminar where the book can be decoded strictly by way of the astrotheological symbolism everywhere that's presented in the text, everywhere. I can see something in the way of a non church affiliated Revelation seminar which is also free to the public, and goes further than everyone else because it uncovers the 'code key' to the text, which is neglected by the usual interpretations that do not make use of the precession theme of the 12 foundational jewels. The interesting thing is that 12 foundational jewels are a foundation in reality, the very foundation for understanding the book itself. And without the foundation of the 12 ages of the Great Year all of the other interpretations that neglect to acknowledge the precession references throughout, have been built on sand foundations. They just fall apart right away because they've been exposed for missing the main point of the text. One can not fully understand the imagery of the Dragon and Beast without understanding the 12 foundational Jewels that decode it. This has some very interesting potential.
This ‘code key’ argument is groundbreaking as a way to reconcile theism and atheism. On the one hand we have an atheist argument about the Great Year, simply describing the empirical cycle of the earth as material fact. On the other hand we have an explanation for the mysterious theistic symbolic language in the Bible, seeing gnosis as knowledge of the stars.

You would be familiar with the fallacious argument that because people have wrongly imputed meaning into Revelation in the past therefore all such attempts are useless. Against this argument we can say that throughout history people have sought to interpret Revelation against their own times, but the advantage we have today is that modern science provides such a strongly reliable cosmology that the stellar story of the Great Year provides an entirely rigorous and compelling reading, if only people took time to study it. Science also provides a cosmology that utterly refutes fundamentalist readings of the ‘left behind’ and ‘bible code’ variety.

At the moment I am reading The Gnostic Paul by Elaine Pagels, Professor of Theology at Princeton University. While she does not explore the stellar reading, she is a giant on whose shoulders we can stand, providing a patient and methodical exposition of how the Valentinian Gnostics understood Paul’s Epistles, and the conflict they had with the orthodox. Setting the analysis that Pagels develops against the claim that the real secret mystery teaching of Christ was the Great Year has great explosive potential.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 2:39 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:41 pm
Posts: 738
Now, I know Madame Blavatsky is controversial, but I have been informed that unless I adopt an attitude of disdain towards her, my comments are not fit for publication. This does not really surprise me, as the university culture these days is utterly hostile to mystical thought. This means any empirical discussion of how the Great Year relates to the evolution of our planet is condemned as obscure. I revised the paper here for publication in the proceedings of the conference where I presented it. At the conference, they said there would be discussion, but it appeared my paper was so upsetting that the discussion was cancelled. Now I have received the following peer review comments.

Quote:
Dear Robert,

We thank you for submitting your article to the Theosophy volume but regret to inform you that unfortunately the content and style of the article is unsuitable for this volume. See peer reviews below.

Thank you again for your interest,
The Editors

Referee 1:
I do not think that this article is publishable, although possibly it might be with extensive re-writing and a much more scholarly approach to the topic. Literature & Aesthetics is a B ranked journal and editors must monitor the academic standard of the submissions. There are a number of problems with the article as it stands, some of which are less and some more significant.

1. It is not clear that the author has the requisite legal permissions to reproduce the figures s/he includes.
2. The article is inadequately referenced and, most seriously, cannot be taken seriously as scholarship as the standard academic work on the topic, Nicholas Campion's The Great Year: Astrology, Millenarianism and History in the Western Tradition (Penguin Arkana, 1994) is not ever mentioned. If the article were to be rewritten, it would be necessary to situate Blavatsky's treatment of the Great Year firmly within Campion's scholarly framework (and I think that would be a lengthy re-write as Campion is a lengthy and very learned work that is not susceptible of being easily digested).
3. The author's attitude to Madame Blavatsky is uncritical, laudatory and typical of a faith-oriented assessment. Author appears largely unaware of academic criticisms of her work (though s/he is aware that she sometimes championed causes that later proved to be wrong).
4. The article degenerates into an obscurantist listing of resemblances and symbols which are not footnoted at all in many cases. It is difficult to imagine how it would be presented in an abstract, as it is not clear what the argument is, what methodology is being applied to Blavatsky's conception of the Great Year, and what conclusions could be drawn from the exercise.


Referee 2:
1 – pg 2 – the author declares s/he will use Blavatsky to make the Bible more coherent. This suggests to me that the author is considering using these texts as manifestations of the real, rather than approaching them with a certain scholarly distance.
2, - pg 4 author describes her as a “pioneer on the path to truth” thus confirming above concern.
4-6 the author gives a good account of the numerical structures of the great year but does so by way of explanation, rather than through scholarly analysis.
Pg 6 – I cannot see the relevance of Kuhn to the Great Year as a paradigm.
Pg 9 – statements such as “the BC/AD moment of the birth of Jesus is conventionally understood as the turning point of time.” suggests again a lack of eagerness on the part of the author to read these facts in a scholarly light – that is, how is this convention maintained, by whom and for what purpose?
Pg 12 – The Secret Doctrine may indeed be able to help interpret sacred texts, but it is not for the academy to do this, rather to analyse how others have sought to do this for the sake of the study of religion.


In the end the paper deals with a range of vitally interesting facts and is based on wide and complex reading of astrology and “The Secret Doctrine” which it treats with an uncritical eye – generally the information in the article is examined from the point of view of an astrologer, perhaps a theosophist, and is not carried out with academic disdain. Unless the author were willing to rewrite the paper with some more academic distance, I would be concerned if such information were published as a peer-reviewed work of the academy.


I sent the journal the following response

Thank you for sharing the peer review comments. I consider they have failed to understand my paper, and have made a number of incorrect comments. I do not find this surprising, as I am presenting new ideas that are difficult to understand. Far from being ‘obscurantist’, ‘uncritical’ or ‘faith-based’, the ideas in my paper are completely scientific. They do in fact point to a new paradigm, so the reviewer’s questioning of the relevance of Kuhn indicates a failure of understanding.
Blavatsky is considered a heretic and radical from all sides. So for me to try to redeem her even partially encounters a natural censorious reaction. I actually think this is typical of the modern university, which has become timid, ignorant and corrupt in its inability to engage in dialogue. The reviewer suggestion that I should be disdainful of Blavatsky is to me a flagrant marker of intellectual timidity. I was surprised that Sydney University held the conference on Theosophy, but the inability to engage with the ideas I have presented is more in line with the modern censorious approach that dominates intellectual life.
As to the mention of Campion, I have read his book on The Great Year, but I thought it was extremely weak, precisely because he exhibits the same timid academic censorious attitude towards religion as the reviewer who recommends it. There is abundant material on the Great Year within Christianity that is discussed by Blavatsky but is ignored by Campion, because of his secularist prejudices and failure to see the meaning of myth.
As to the comment on legal permissions, all the diagrams in the paper are my original work, although the first is based on a source diagram as referenced. I have looked to find if anyone claims copyright on this diagram but did not find any. I have footnoted all my sources. Where there are no footnotes it means this is original work. The criticism regarding footnoting implies that my original research is unwelcome. The timid attitude of the modern censor is that if something has not been said before it cannot be possible.
I am happy to enter dialogue about any of these issues.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 9:22 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 4331
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Sorry to hear they wouldn't publish your paper.

Quote:
"I know Madame Blavatsky is controversial, but I have been informed that unless I adopt an attitude of disdain towards her, my comments are not fit for publication."

That's blatant discrimination. Many other highly respected scholars have discussed Blavatsky with no problem.

_________________
2013 Astrotheology Calendar
The Mythicist Position
Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection
Stellar House Publishing at Youtube


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 11:46 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 2247
Location: Everywhere
It looks like they took you for some crazed crack pot Theosophist blindly believing in Blavatsky in a religious devotee sense and red flagged everything based on that incorrect assumption. Instead of paying attention to the actual subject matter

_________________
The Jesus Mythicist Creed:
The "Jesus Christ" of the New Testament is a fictional composite of characters, real and mythical. A composite of multiple "people" is no one.

The celestial Origins of Religious Belief
ZG Part 1
Jesus: Hebrew Human or Mythical Messiah?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 2:04 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:41 pm
Posts: 738
What I find interesting is the implications around paradigm shift. My paper used Blavatsky, actually in quite a critical way, as a platform to articulate my views on a new paradigm based on the Great Year as a framework for cosmology. I am continually amazed at how ignorant and biased mainstream academics are about this whole area of research.

For example The Religion of the Mithras Cult in the Roman Empire - Mysteries of the Unconquered Sun by Roger Beck, published by Oxford University Press, states "David Ulansey (1989) had the temerity to propose that the tauroctony encoded one of ancient astronomy’s most important and highly technical discoveries, the ‘precession of the equinoxes’" and rejects Ulansey's work out of hand. This is an example of the inability to understand how central observation of the stars was to ancient religion.

Similarly, David Tacey, in Jung and the New Age, uses New Age as a synonym for self-help literature, defines the Age of Aquarius as a short period in the 1960s, and completely ignores cosmology. You can see the intimidation of his hostile censors breaking through on every page, to the extent that Tacey has internalised the criticisms and is seeking affirmation from others who also refuse to see that the emperor's new clothes are his birthday suit. The fact is Jung is a prophet of the New Age, his theory of unconscious archetypes points to actual natural processes that we do not understand, but which break through as symbols, and the derision of popular cultural use of Jungian ideas is a cheap shot that fails to get to the essence of why these ideas are popular. The fact is that Jungian language is often an inchoate expression of a real intuition about the errors of old cultural patterns.

My paper includes material on the precessional basis of imagery in Revelation that is my own original research, and which I am completely confident will be scientifically accepted once people who understand it start to talk about it. Critics will have to swallow their assumptions and prejudices. The basic problem is that no one is willing to discuss this material publicly in detail. Acharya has started to do so with related topics, and been slapped down and silenced. It touches on major emotional unconscious problems, such as the nature of religion, the meaning of apocalyptic imagery, and the psychological errors of modernity. People are very prejudiced about all these topics, and it is really hard to break the material down into simple steps such that the points of disagreement can be made explicit and the logical basis for a new paradigm can become a matter for dialogue. Terms of abuse such as 'obscurantist' could be taken as a starting point for dialogue, except that those who hurl them seek to completely prevent dialogue, casting new ideas into the outer darkness. Again, the Bible offers some help here, turning the tables on its traditional defenders.

Venturing again into symbolic comment, it is like our current position near the end of the Age of Pisces is like a baby in the womb just about to be born, who cannot imagine that there is a bigger reality outside, and sees their womb-world as the whole cosmos. Thinkers like Blavatsky and Jung are prophets of the Age of Aquarius, prescient individuals who point the path to a real future when culture will be integrated with nature, instead of standing in opposition to it. It is hardly surprising there is such extreme resistance to their ideas from people whose careers are built on an incomplete cosmology. The term 'New Age' has become a label of abuse, with writers such as Tacey creating a caricature and then demolishing their straw man.

I'm reminded of a verse from the Australian song From Little Things Big Things Grow "Then Vincent Lingiarri returned in an aeroplane Back to his country once more to sit down And he told his people let the stars keep on turning We have friends in the south, in the cities and towns."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group