Freethought Nation

presented by Acharya S and TruthBeKnown.com, online since 1995

It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 4:12 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Booktalk
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:30 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:41 pm
Posts: 738
I hope it is okay to use this thread to draw attention to my favourite troll, Stahrwe of Booktalk.org

Chris O'Connor, Booktalk owner, came across a creationist by the name of Joe Coffey, and started a thread to debunk Joe's claims, which are very smooth and smartly presented, but as with any apologist, garbage once you look.

The thread is http://www.booktalk.org/let-s-analyze-d ... 1-420.html

It is now a marathon 29 pages, mainly because Booktalk's resident troll insists on gumming it up with long posts aimed mainly at preventing readers from following the discussion. You can safely ignore everything Stahrwe says and not miss anything worthwhile, except to marvel at how hopeless he is at clutching at straws. He now has a sidekick called Dawn who is equally thick. A sidebarabout boofhead is worth seeing.

Anyway, it has turned into an interesting discussion about the linguistic origins of Biblical ideas. I referenced Acharya's comments on Justin Martyr, which prompted the troll to make ad hominem attacks on Acharya, including the lame $1000 challenge.

One of the mods, Interbane, just posted the following, including a good quote on Osiris and Lazarus from zeitgeist, in response to the $1000 challenge:

Interbane wrote:
Stahrwe:
Quote:
Anyone interested in some extra holiday money should check out


The original words can be found through various sources. Some of the information is taken from the Pyramid Texts.

Here is the full text.

Then here are some excerpts as an example of the parallels.

The references to other scholars follow a trail of breadcrumbs to not only these texts, but other texts that predate Christianity. Of course, some interpretation is required, such as comparing the different calendars and understanding that the winter solstice is December 25th.



For info.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:35 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 4337
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Thanks for posting that Robert. The ZG Challenge has absolutely no intention of ever paying up.

That image of the Egyptian text and Gospel of John came from Acharya's book, Christ in Egypt pages 305 to 307.

_________________
2013 Astrotheology Calendar
The Mythicist Position
Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection
Stellar House Publishing at Youtube


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 3:34 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 2248
Location: Everywhere
We just hit page 50 of little more than Stahrwe making a complete ass of himself trying to prove that Christianity is only a relationship with Jesus, not a religion, and it's free and clear of the bible. What a piece of work:

http://www.booktalk.org/let-s-analyze-d ... 1-720.html

I see that some of the members here at FTN have been looking in on this one. Stahrwe is actually worse than just about any apologist we've ever had here at the FTN forums. None of them will really concede when they're wrong, less a few on a few points, but Stahrwe seems extra stubborn about it. I've never seen anyone butcher the context of something quite the way he does. And Stahrwe loves to try and butcher the context of Acharya quotes now that he realizes what the MP is and what it does to his fundamentalist oriented Southern Baptist beliefs...

_________________
The Jesus Mythicist Creed:
The "Jesus Christ" of the New Testament is a fictional composite of characters, real and mythical. A composite of multiple "people" is no one.

The celestial Origins of Religious Belief
ZG Part 1
Jesus: Hebrew Human or Mythical Messiah?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:47 pm 
Offline
Hercules

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 5:19 pm
Posts: 58
i am reminded of the don mclean song

stahrwe starhrwe night....

:lol: :lol: :lol:

and of course my favourite stahrwe quote

"Campbell is a hack"

i wouldn't be surprised if trolls actually call their trolls stahrwe, like the troll word for troll is actually stahrwe :lol:

but as they say "it takes all kinds" and at least he is mainly a threat to himself, heck after a few beers he might be entertaining, or start a fight, either way it would beat reading his "posts".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:16 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 2248
Location: Everywhere
That idiot is locked in. He spends his days and nights lusting after trolling threads at BT. I'll kick his ass around for a while here and there for publicity sake, and then leave it alone when it gets too old. Some of the BT members get a kick out it judging by all of the post thanks I receive there. And I like to keep them all informed and up to date with new videos and blogs of interest. I've introduced GodAlmighty's work which seems to be well received so far. They're a book smart intellectual community in large part and GodAlmighty's style, logic, and reason, is something that would likely be well understood and appreciated there, less of course by Stahrwe. He absolutely hates it!!!

Take a look at Stahrwe trying to get me to take down GodAlmighty's "The New Testament was written in the second century" video series from where I posted it in the Bible and Christianity forum section:

http://www.booktalk.org/the-nt-was-writ ... t9974.html

:lol:

_________________
The Jesus Mythicist Creed:
The "Jesus Christ" of the New Testament is a fictional composite of characters, real and mythical. A composite of multiple "people" is no one.

The celestial Origins of Religious Belief
ZG Part 1
Jesus: Hebrew Human or Mythical Messiah?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:31 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:32 pm
Posts: 1988
Location: U.S.A.
That Stahrwe person is delusionally lost in Wonderland, isn't he?

_________________
Mriana

Nonviolence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man. ~ Gandhi

Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are still savages. ~ Thomas A. Edison


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:37 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 2248
Location: Everywhere
Yes.

_________________
The Jesus Mythicist Creed:
The "Jesus Christ" of the New Testament is a fictional composite of characters, real and mythical. A composite of multiple "people" is no one.

The celestial Origins of Religious Belief
ZG Part 1
Jesus: Hebrew Human or Mythical Messiah?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:45 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:32 pm
Posts: 1988
Location: U.S.A.
Maybe one day such people will cease to exist or they will be so much in the minority, that we don't know they exist.

_________________
Mriana

Nonviolence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man. ~ Gandhi

Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are still savages. ~ Thomas A. Edison


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 7:30 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 2248
Location: Everywhere
Well, from what I understand the polls show fundamentalism in decline here in the US. So slowly but surely it will likely die off into insignificance. I told Stahrwe that he and his generation will be taking a lot of this to the grave. And it's because kids are getting smarter and smarter these days. It's obvious that when you have to resort to semantic games in order to try and prove that you have absolute truth, you've shown your ass. The kids can see it. They move on. A lot of BS dies off from generation to generation.

_________________
The Jesus Mythicist Creed:
The "Jesus Christ" of the New Testament is a fictional composite of characters, real and mythical. A composite of multiple "people" is no one.

The celestial Origins of Religious Belief
ZG Part 1
Jesus: Hebrew Human or Mythical Messiah?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 12:48 am 
Offline
Hercules

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 5:19 pm
Posts: 58
Tat Tvam Asi wrote:
Take a look at Stahrwe trying to get me to take down GodAlmighty's "The New Testament was written in the second century" video series from where I posted it in the Bible and Christianity forum section:

http://www.booktalk.org/the-nt-was-writ ... t9974.html

:lol:


:lol: so it's all good!

some great posts going on and with stahrwe as the opposition it just makes the truth look that little bit more enticing :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 6:19 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:45 am
Posts: 525
stahrwe wrote:
My problem with the videos is that they are a lazy way of presenting information.



:shock:
Wow. Just, wow.

It took me six months, working 5-6 hours a day, everyday, to make that series. Nothing more need be said. He has no idea what he's talking about.

The sources are screen capped and posted right there on the video. It is not just me making an audible reference and then you have to go and search on your own to verify. I already did all the work for the viewer. The sources are on screen. And anyone who watched, would realize that.

He refuses to watch. THAT is outright laziness. Fear-induced laziness, but laziness nonetheless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 7:51 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 2248
Location: Everywhere
I'm going to quote this post on the thread in response to Stahrwe just to let readers there see your reaction to these accusations. I posted your video series because the information is provided for the viewer in as plain and easy a way as humanly possible. That's what gives the series such power and force. Apparently the force was felt right away by the reaction Stahrwe gave it. He was immediately threatened. And that sort of reaction from the apologist / troll can only create more interest for the series for the casual reader browsing BT. They'll have to wonder why he's so upset about it? Why does he want to censor it by having it deleted? Stahrwe is his own worst enemy in that respect...

youkrst wrote:
so it's all good!

some great posts going on and with stahrwe as the opposition it just makes the truth look that little bit more enticing


Yes indeed. :wink:

_________________
The Jesus Mythicist Creed:
The "Jesus Christ" of the New Testament is a fictional composite of characters, real and mythical. A composite of multiple "people" is no one.

The celestial Origins of Religious Belief
ZG Part 1
Jesus: Hebrew Human or Mythical Messiah?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:51 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 2248
Location: Everywhere
So now, on page 50 of Roberts link, I just pulled out the bible because Stahrwe insists that the people in Athens are proof that the bible and even the name of Jesus is not necessary to be a Christian, because these people weren't told about the bible or even Jesus' name. This is aimed at his proselytizing efforts in the atheist forums because he knows about all of the problems with the bible that atheists bring up, and so he started trying to say that atheists can simply have a personal relationship with Jesus and be Christians without the bible thinking that he could support such a claim:

http://www.booktalk.org/post81613.html#p81613

Quote:
Stahrweak wrote:
I have shown in the case of Dismas and Acts that people became Christians without the Bible and in the Acts case without Jesus being mentioned.


...But, let's look at Paul in Acts to see whether or not the bible or Jesus is mentioned:
Quote:
Acts 13:16 Standing up, Paul motioned with his hand and said: “Fellow Israelites and you Gentiles who worship God, listen to me! 17 The God of the people of Israel chose our ancestors; he made the people prosper during their stay in Egypt; with mighty power he led them out of that country;

Pretty clear. Paul is preaching that the God of Israel, the biblical God who was the God of Noah who fathered all nations according to the scriptures, is the God he is preaching to both Jews and Gentiles.
Quote:
26 “Fellow children of Abraham and you God-fearing Gentiles, it is to us that this message of salvation has been sent.

Still, very clear as to who the God in question is.
Quote:
32 “We tell you the good news: What God promised our ancestors 33 he has fulfilled for us, their children, by raising up Jesus.

Oh, so the God of Jewish scripture fulfilled a promise by raising up Jesus. This is Pauls message to the Jews and God-rearing Gentiles who worship God in Antioch.
Quote:
Acts 14:1 At Iconium Paul and Barnabas went as usual into the Jewish synagogue. There they spoke so effectively that a great number of Jews and Greeks believed. 2 But the Jews who refused to believe stirred up the other Gentiles and poisoned their minds against the brothers.

So they go on preaching this same message to the Jews and Gentiles at Iconium, the message of the God of Jewish scripture and his son Jesus who is the man he raised up from the dead.
Quote:
11 When the crowd saw what Paul had done, they shouted in the Lycaonian language, “The gods have come down to us in human form!” 12 Barnabas they called Zeus, and Paul they called Hermes because he was the chief speaker. 13 The priest of Zeus, whose temple was just outside the city, brought bulls and wreaths to the city gates because he and the crowd wanted to offer sacrifices to them.

14 But when the apostles Barnabas and Paul heard of this, they tore their clothes and rushed out into the crowd, shouting: 15 “Friends, why are you doing this? We too are only human, like you. We are bringing you good news, telling you to turn from these worthless things to the living God, who made the heavens and the earth and the sea and everything in them. 16 In the past, he let all nations go their own way. 17 Yet he has not left himself without testimony: He has shown kindness by giving you rain from heaven and crops in their seasons; he provides you with plenty of food and fills your hearts with joy.” 18 Even with these words, they had difficulty keeping the crowd from sacrificing to them.

So Paul made it clear that he's not preaching Zeus or Hermes or any pagan God, he's preaching the biblical God of Jewish scripture and that God's son who came as a man and died for our sins and who was resurrected by the God of Jewish scripture, the biblical God. This is the context of the book of Acts as we approach the 17th chapter. Then Paul goes to Athens and does what he always does, he goes to the synagogue to speak to the Jews and God-fearing Gentiles:
Quote:
In Athens
16 While Paul was waiting for them in Athens, he was greatly distressed to see that the city was full of idols. 17 So he reasoned in the synagogue with both Jews and God-fearing Greeks, as well as in the marketplace day by day with those who happened to be there. 18 A group of Epicurean and Stoic philosophers began to debate with him. Some of them asked, “What is this babbler trying to say?” Others remarked, “He seems to be advocating foreign gods.” They said this because Paul was preaching the good news about Jesus and the resurrection.

What? These Stoic philosophers knew that he was preaching of a foreign God? And they said this because Paul was preaching Jesus and the resurrection? Let's continue in context here shall we Stahrwe:
Quote:
Then they took him and brought him to a meeting of the Areopagus, where they said to him, “May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting? 20 You are bringing some strange ideas to our ears, and we would like to know what they mean.” 21 (All the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there spent their time doing nothing but talking about and listening to the latest ideas.)

So, after preaching about the God of Jewish scripture, a foreign God to them, and about Jesus and the resurrection, Paul then goes on to find a way of trying to relate the foreign God of Israel and his son Jesus of the resurrection to these Gentiles in Athens:
Quote:
22 Paul then stood up in the meeting of the Areopagus and said: “People of Athens! I see that in every way you are very religious. 23 For as I walked around and looked carefully at your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: TO AN UNKNOWN GOD. So you are ignorant of the very thing you worship—and this is what I am going to proclaim to you.

24 “The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by human hands. 25 And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything. Rather, he himself gives everyone life and breath and everything else. 26 From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands. 27 God did this so that they would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from any one of us. 28 ‘For in him we live and move and have our being.’ As some of your own poets have said, ‘We are his offspring.’[c]


So Paul relates the creation account of the bible orally, the story where the God of Israel originally created the world and one man in it, from which all men are descended. He's preaching the context of the biblical account to these Stoic philosophers in a way that he thinks they might understand it, after already being summoned to speak because he was going around the synogue and streets preaching about Jesus and the resurrection which is the context of why he's even speaking with these Gentiles in the first place!!!
Quote:
29 “Therefore since we are God’s offspring, we should not think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone—an image made by human design and skill. 30 In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent. 31 For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to everyone by raising him from the dead.

So after preaching about Jesus and the resurrection, Paul was invited to come and speak more about it at which point he refers back to Jesus as the man that the Jewish scriptural God has appointed. That is the context of the verse. You were wrong the entire time Stahrwe. Like Johnson said, "Stahrwe's wrong, Suprise everyone". :lol: :mrgreen:
Quote:
32 When they heard about the resurrection of the dead, some of them sneered, but others said, “We want to hear you again on this subject.” 33 At that, Paul left the Council. 34 Some of the people became followers of Paul and believed. Among them was Dionysius, a member of the Areopagus, also a woman named Damaris, and a number of others.

So those who believed are those who accepted Pauls message about the Jewish scriptural God of the bible being their true God and Jesus being the messiah who was resurrected by the biblical God and who is supposed to bring about the resurrection of the dead. These people, in fact, were accepting the name of Jesus in order to believe in him and it's a great act of dishonesty on your part to have tried to come along and twist the context into appearing to suggest otherwise Stahrwe. They need an icon for "facepalm" in this forum!!!

_________________
The Jesus Mythicist Creed:
The "Jesus Christ" of the New Testament is a fictional composite of characters, real and mythical. A composite of multiple "people" is no one.

The celestial Origins of Religious Belief
ZG Part 1
Jesus: Hebrew Human or Mythical Messiah?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:44 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 2248
Location: Everywhere
Still not getting it, Stahrwe pushes forward:

Quote:
Stahrwe wrote:
The passage I am referencing in Acts clearly shows that people became Christians without the name Jesus being mentioned. Now, it is likely that they had heard the name prior to Paul’s presentation but it is not mentioned in the record presented to us.


If you take this route and dump the greater context of the story in Acts which states in verse 18 that Paul was preaching Jesus and the resurrection, then you have to apply the same standard of dumping the context to the fact that the name Christian is never mentioned in the record presented to us in verses 30 to 33 either!!! Therefore no one at the meeting ever became a Christian without the mention of Jesus according to the standard you yourself have just put forward Stahrwe.

What we are left with is a situation where Paul is talking about some unknown man who was resurrected and some the Gentiles believed Paul about this unknown man. Nowhere is Jesus, Christ, or Christianity mentioned, therefore by your standard we can't even accept this as a case where anyone became a Christian in the first place, or became a Christ-Follower at all:
Quote:
30 In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent.

31 For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to everyone by raising him from the dead.”

32 When they heard about the resurrection of the dead, some of them sneered, but others said, “We want to hear you again on this subject.”

33 At that, Paul left the Council. 34 Some of the people became followers of Paul and believed. Among them was Dionysius, a member of the Areopagus, also a woman named Damaris, and a number of others.


That's what happens when you try to dump the context of the passage in favor of claiming that people were converted to "Christianity" without the mention of "Jesus". You're wrong by the standard you set. And if you toss that standard and point out that bible means "Christian" by saying "followers of Paul" then it also clearly means "Jesus" by saying "the man he has appointed". And notice how no one became a believer due to the speech in question. Some said that they wanted to hear it "again". At that Paul left the counsil. And then some people became followers and believed. No one was even converted at the counsil to begin with!!! What did Paul tell them when they wanted to hear more about it? It doesn't say. He apparently had to expand on the speech that he had given in the counsil after he left, and it was Pauls speech along with this silent part of the story which led to people becoming followers of Paul and believing.

Stahrwe's wrong across the entire board everybody, surprise again.

_________________
The Jesus Mythicist Creed:
The "Jesus Christ" of the New Testament is a fictional composite of characters, real and mythical. A composite of multiple "people" is no one.

The celestial Origins of Religious Belief
ZG Part 1
Jesus: Hebrew Human or Mythical Messiah?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Booktalk
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:20 pm 
Offline
Hercules

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 5:19 pm
Posts: 58
Quote:
Still not getting it, Stahrwe pushes forward:


:lol:

the citadel of ignorance as yet unassailable

i wonder if the universe will have to move on without him, i hope not

sometimes i think god is a joker and people like stahrwe and jp holding are moving into the "punch line zone"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group