Freethought Nation

presented by Acharya S and TruthBeKnown.com, online since 1995

It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 7:31 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:23 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 2248
Location: Everywhere
Forum stalker?

It sounds like "Cheeseburger" is a bit of Trollburger....

_________________
The Jesus Mythicist Creed:
The "Jesus Christ" of the New Testament is a fictional composite of characters, real and mythical. A composite of multiple "people" is no one.

The celestial Origins of Religious Belief
ZG Part 1
Jesus: Hebrew Human or Mythical Messiah?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:18 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:45 am
Posts: 525
michaelsherlock wrote:
The first thinks she is an ancient Egyptian worshipper of Isis, and the other loves Cheeseburgers.


Wait, she thinks she IS an ANCIENT Egyptian worshipper of Isis? Do you mean she believes in reincarnation and that she worshipped Isis in a past life or something to that effect? Or do you mean she is a modern day worshipper of an ancient goddess?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:26 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 2248
Location: Everywhere
^And if she does think she is a reincarnation of an ancient Egypt Isis cult worshiper then she just totally f@#cked up by showing that she knew nothing about the ancient requirements where ONLY a virgin could portray Isis in ritual, in keeping with the primary source texts where Isis is described as a virgin mother goddess. Oh, these troll bags. We get all types...

_________________
The Jesus Mythicist Creed:
The "Jesus Christ" of the New Testament is a fictional composite of characters, real and mythical. A composite of multiple "people" is no one.

The celestial Origins of Religious Belief
ZG Part 1
Jesus: Hebrew Human or Mythical Messiah?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:53 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:45 am
Posts: 525
Indeed, that would be one problem. The other would be that all the Egyptologists I've read are unanimous in the opinion that reincarnation did not enter Egyptian theology until it was introduced by foreigners after the Persian rulership of Egypt. I think the earliest reference to a reincarnation belief in Egypt was Herodotus, if I'm not mistaken, and he actually says the Egyptians invented the doctrine, another thing scholars today say is mistaken.

But given that both Greeks and Persians were in contact with India at this point (hell, the Persian kingdom was neighbors with India), and by the time of Herodotus, Persians & Greeks were also in contact, obviously, with Egypt, then it is likely reincarnation was transferred from the east to Egypt by means of such a chain of contact.

Not that the foundations for accepting such a doctrine weren't already in place within indigenous Egyptian mythology. Afterall, Horus was technically the reincarnation of Osiris, and the bas of Osiris included Sokar, the Apis, and the Phoenix, all of which were perpetually born again over & over. The pharaohs were likewise believed to be embodiments or avatars or whatever for Horus and Osiris, so that could be analogous to reincarnation as well.

Nevertheless, no matter how ripe Egypt was to receive the doctrine of the reincarnation of the soul, the fact remains that there's no evidence that such a doctrine existed in Egypt before the fifth century BCE or somewhere thereabouts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:09 pm
Posts: 1954
Good posts. The typical ignoramus pretending to be an expert - what else is new? As we know, we have already PROVED that Isis was considered the "Great Virgin," a concept that dates back many thousands of years and was earlier applied to the goddess Neith. Neith is the original Goddess who brings forth parthenogenetically or autogenetically, without any male consort. Anyone who doesn't know this very ancient concept of the Virgin Mother Goddess has no business calling herself a "priestess" of any goddess.

Herodotus on Reincarnation

In the meantime, Herodotus discusses Egyptian reincarnation, metempsychosis or transmigration at Histories 2.123:

Quote:
The Egyptians say that Demeter and Dionysus are the chief powers in the underworld; and they were also the first people to put forward the doctrine of the immortality of the soul, and to maintain that after death it enters another creature at the moment of that creature's birth. It then makes the round of all living things--animals, birds, and fish--until it finally passes once again, at birth, into the body of a man. The whole period of transmigration occupies three thousand years. This theory has been adopted by certain Greek writers, some earlier, some later, who have put it forward as their own. Their names are known to me, but I refrain from mentioning them. (Herodotus/de Selincourt, 131)

Herodotus editor John Marincola here notes that the "unnamed writers are the Pythagoreans and the Orphics, who probably did not owe their doctrine of the transmigration of souls to the Egyptians." (Herodotus/de Selincourt, 566)

Here's another translation:

Quote:
The Egyptians say that Demeter and Dionysos are rulers of the world below; and the Egyptians are also the first who reported the doctrine that the soul of man is immortal, and that when the body dies, the soul enters into another creature which chances then to be coming to the birth, and when it has gone the round of all the creatures of land and sea and of the air, it enters again into a human body as it comes to the birth; and that it makes this round in a period of three thousand years. This doctrine certain Hellenes adopted, some earlier and some later, as if it were of their own invention, and of these men I know the names but I abstain from recording them. (The History of Herodotus, parallel English/Greek, tr. G. C. Macaulay, [1890])

Here's the original Greek:

Quote:
ἀρχηγετέειν δὲ τῶν κάτω Αἰγύπτιοι λέγουσι Δήμητρα καὶ Διόνυσον. πρῶτοι δὲ καὶ τόνδε τὸν λόγον Αἰγύπτιοι εἰσὶ οἱ εἰπόντες, ὡς ἀνθρώπου ψυχὴ ἀθάνατος ἐστί, τοῦ σώματος δὲ καταφθίνοντος ἐς ἄλλο ζῷον αἰεὶ γινόμενον ἐσδύεται, ἐπεὰν δὲ πάντα περιέλθῃ τὰ χερσαῖα καὶ τὰ θαλάσσια καὶ τὰ πετεινά, αὖτις ἐς ἀνθρώπου σῶμα γινόμενον ἐσδύνει· τὴν περιήλυσιν δὲ αὐτῇ γίνεσθαι ἐν τρισχιλίοισι ἔτεσι. τούτῳ τῷ λόγῳ εἰσὶ οἳ Ἑλλήνων ἐχρήσαντο, οἳ μὲν πρότερον οἳ δὲ ὕστερον, ὡς ἰδίῳ ἑωυτῶν ἐόντι· τῶν ἐγὼ εἰδὼς τὰ οὐνόματα οὐ γράφω.

The word for "transmigration" here is περιήλυσις or perielusis, which means "coming around" or "revolution."

And another English translation of the Herodotus passage:

Quote:
The Egyptians are the first who propounded the theory that the human soul is imperishable, and that where the body of any one dies it enters into some other body that may be ready to receive it; and that when it has gone the round of all created forms on land, in water, and in air, then it once more enters the human body born for it; and that this cycle of existence for the soul takes place in three thousand years.

This description of transmigration is very similar to the Indian concept, especially as has been proselytized most publicly by the Hare Krishnas, who hold that we will all come back as insects if we don't follow their doctrines, of course.

In any event, we would not be surprised if the Egyptians were influenced by the Indians. Such influence goes back much further than is suspected. Let us not forget the Mitanni kingdom with its Indian gods in Turkey some 1,500 years before the common era. Also recall that the Persians are Indians who left the motherland at least 3,000 years ago. It would not be surprising if the bulk of the Indian reincarnation concept had already been developed by then, five or more centuries before Herodotus, and was passed along either through the Persians or otherwise.

Jews are ancient Indian philosophers

Let us also recall the following fascinating tidbit by Josephus, which explains much, including the Brahma-Abraham relationship. According to Josephus (Apion, 1.22/1.179), the Greek philosopher Aristotle related of the Jews from "Celesyria" (Κοίλη Συρία "Hollow Syria," referring to the southern valley area, including Judea):

Quote:
...these Jews are derived from the Indian philosophers; they are named by the Indians Calami, and by the Syrians Judaei, and took their name from the country they inhabit, which is called Judea...

This revealing quote is much overlooked, but it seems Josephus was accurately reporting a true development, whether or not Aristotle originally recounted it. Another transliteration of this name "Calami" is "Calani." I have written much about this subject of Indian influence on the Levant for my book The Christ Myth Anthology, which is unfortunately on the back burner at the moment.

_________________
Why suffer from Egyptoparallelophobia, when you can read Christ in Egypt? Try it - you'll like it:

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:31 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:45 am
Posts: 525
Acharya wrote:
The Egyptians are the first who propounded the theory that the human soul is imperishable, and that where the body of any one dies it enters into some other body that may be ready to receive it; and that when it has gone the round of all created forms on land, in water, and in air, then it once more enters the human body born for it; and that this cycle of existence for the soul takes place in three thousand years.


I like this translation a lot better. It makes it seem to me more like it was a Greek misinterpretation of certain events that take place in the funerary literature of Egypt, in particular I am thinking of the long sequence of spells in the Coffin Texts and Book of the Dead in which the deceased shape-shifts and takes on the forms of numerous animals and numerous other gods in order to obtain that god's power or that animal's abilities, many of them being elemental in nature, which I suspect is where the "all created forms, on land, in water, and in air" comes from.

For instance, the Coffin Texts have a chunk of several spells in which the deceased shape-shifts into Shu in order to gain control of the wind, this to me would cover "and in the air", as would all of the spells for turning the deceased into several types of birds- falcons, geese, eagles, etc.

Then there's a series of spells for causing the deceased to take on the form of the Nile God and gain power to control the floods and irrigation, etc., this would cover the "in water", as would the spells for shape-shifting into a crocodile or a cat-fish, etc.

So this isn't exactly reincarnation in the Eastern sense, it's not a disembodied ethereal "soul" entering into a separate already existing body. It was the resurrected deceased obtaining the forms of all the gods and animals in order to gain their abilities. I can see though how a Greek with only an arm chair knowledge of this would be reminded of reincarnation.

The 3,000 year bit is what stumps me though. I don't recall having read anything relating to that thus far in the funerary literature I have.


Acharya wrote:
Josephus wrote:
...these Jews are derived from the Indian philosophers;


Wow, that's very interesting. Never heard that one before.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:42 pm 
Offline
Isis

Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:42 pm
Posts: 1006
Quote:
...these Jews are derived from the Indian philosophers; they are named by the Indians Calami, and by the Syrians Judaei, and took their name from the country they inhabit, which is called Judea...

This revealing quote is much overlooked, but it seems Josephus was accurately reporting a true development, whether or not Aristotle originally recounted it. Another transliteration of this name "Calami" is "Calani." I have written much about this subject of Indian influence on the Levant for my book The Christ Myth Anthology, which is unfortunately on the back burner at the moment.[/quote]

I've heard this derivation for the Iudi from 'Calami' or 'Calani' before also in the works of Godfrey Higgins' "Anacalypisis', probably reporting from the Josephus source. I hesitate to use the modern term 'Jews' because of it's misleading perceptions. However, I would like to know if you discovered the origins and etymology of the versions of the name given above. I recall (since it's been so long since I read Higgins) that Higgins also related districts etc. in India that also invoke the name of Oude, Solymi (Solomon-like names) and other biblical type names having a source in India. He also related that the Arab or Saracen (i) have a connection to India in some of the same ways (pre-Islamic). He had quite theory of things, but I don't hesitate to accept his recognition of these pecularities.

_________________
"They must find it difficult...those who have taken authority as truth, rather than truth as the Authority." -- Gerald Massey, Egyptologist
http://www.myspace.com/skullnboner


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:39 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:09 pm
Posts: 1954
Higgins has many good facts and is a good place to start in a number of instances, using primary and the most modern sources to validate his contentions. His book is so jam-packed, however, that there are bound to be errors in it, and some of the facts are not so easily validated. That being said, Anacalypsis is quite a work tying so many of these ideas together that it could take a lifetime to back up all the contentions, going off in every direction, tracking down all the primary sources, etc.

In any event, I took the position in Christ Conspiracy that the Jews were an Indian tribe whose god was Brahma, that they arrived in the Levant via Ur, that Brahma and Sarasvati were demoted to a "patriarch" and his wife, etc. What is clear is that there is a tremendous amount of Indian thought and mythology in the Bible, including in the New Testament, with a significant infusion of both Buddhism and Hinduism in the centuries surrounding the common era. Christianity is a result of not only Egyptian but also Indian cultural influence, as well as the Greek, Roman, Syrian, European and so on. Hence, Christianity is called "universal," the meaning of the word "Catholic."

_________________
Why suffer from Egyptoparallelophobia, when you can read Christ in Egypt? Try it - you'll like it:

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:14 pm 
Offline
Thor

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:06 pm
Posts: 46
Acharya wrote:
Higgins has many good facts and is a good place to start in a number of instances, using primary and the most modern sources to validate his contentions. His book is so jam-packed, however, that there are bound to be errors in it, and some of the facts are not so easily validated. That being said, Anacalypsis is quite a work tying so many of these ideas together that it could take a lifetime to back up all the contentions, going off in every direction, tracking down all the primary sources, etc.

In any event, I took the position in Christ Conspiracy that the Jews were an Indian tribe whose god was Brahma, that they arrived in the Levant via Ur, that Brahma and Sarasvati were demoted to a "patriarch" and his wife, etc. What is clear is that there is a tremendous amount of Indian thought and mythology in the Bible, including in the New Testament, with a significant infusion of both Buddhism and Hinduism in the centuries surrounding the common era. Christianity is a result of not only Egyptian but also Indian cultural influence, as well as the Greek, Roman, Syrian, European and so on. Hence, Christianity is called "universal," the meaning of the word "Catholic."


I agree regarding Higgins' work. Of course, in any scholarly work there are errors, but the obligation of the reader is to sift through, critically analyze and do their own research. Many people are in the habit of writing off an author or scholar if they find a mistake or two, yet this to me, seems to be a rather illogical approach. I think the main reason people do this is due to laziness and dependency. They want and desire a one-stop shop for truth, and unfortunately, non-exist.

Regarding the Indian roots of the Hebrews, this is certainly a possibility. I think your theory is a good one, and their is another that I propose in the 2nd volume of my 'I Am Christ' series. I look at the possibility via the ancient people known as the Mitannis, who in the early to mid-2nd millenium BCE colanized Syria, and traded with Egypt. This group was originally from the Indus Valley and records indicate that they were Hindu. I think this is another possibility which might explain some of the philological and mythological similarities between the Hebrews and the Hindus.

_________________
You can always trust a person in search of the truth, but never the one who has found it. Manly P. Hall

http://michaelsherlockauthor.blogspot.jp/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:59 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:41 pm
Posts: 738
Michael

Your commentary on Isis is excellent. The cheeseburger analogy for literal historical faith makes good sense as a degraded and insensitive McInterpretation. McFaith presents a powerful, simple, seductive and convenient reading that blinds people to its failure to engage with any depth of understanding, like the nutritional impact of a cheeseburger.

Peter Gandy, author of The Jesus Mysteries, recently made a comment on Gnosticism that is relevant here
Peter Gandy wrote:
[Perhaps the Gnostics] allowed people to have their own take on who Jesus was as a way of grading initiates according to their level of understanding. Those who saw Jesus as a creature of flesh were themselves still 'sarkic' (the lowest level of consciousness) whereas those who could understand that Jesus only 'appeared' to be human were 'psychic', i.e. 'true' Gnostics. As one Gnostic text states quite clearly, each initiate understands Jesus according to their own level of understanding. By allowing a multitude of different views they could rank followers according to their level of Gnosis. ... we never hear Gnostics say outright that someone is wrong to believe that Jesus was a man of flesh and blood, but we can imagine that they secretly thought such a person to be at the lowest level of consciousness.

My view, following Elaine Pagels' discussion in The Gnostic Paul, is that the psychic view that Jesus seemed to be a man stands below the Gnostic 'pneumatic' view that this seeming is itself an illusion, because the real identity of Christ is purely eternal.

Isis is an image of eternal purity and fertility in feminine identity. Anyone who denies the archetypal nature of Isis as virgin mother suffers a basic failure of spiritual understanding. But that is what happens when people's minds are polluted by junk.

A big part of the problem of corruption in Christianity is the political drive to emphasise patriarchal control, including the usurping of the Isis myth as the Blessed Virgin Mary, who represents female subservience within a controlled patriarchal framework, demoted from the Trinity. People who hold to the patriarchal social view of gender relations will inevitably dismiss all discussion of Isis as an autonomous and equal symbol of female power.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 4:14 pm 
Offline
Thor

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:06 pm
Posts: 46
Robert Tulip wrote:
Michael

Your commentary on Isis is excellent. The cheeseburger analogy for literal historical faith makes good sense as a degraded and insensitive McInterpretation. McFaith presents a powerful, simple, seductive and convenient reading that blinds people to its failure to engage with any depth of understanding, like the nutritional impact of a cheeseburger.

Peter Gandy, author of The Jesus Mysteries, recently made a comment on Gnosticism that is relevant here
Peter Gandy wrote:
[Perhaps the Gnostics] allowed people to have their own take on who Jesus was as a way of grading initiates according to their level of understanding. Those who saw Jesus as a creature of flesh were themselves still 'sarkic' (the lowest level of consciousness) whereas those who could understand that Jesus only 'appeared' to be human were 'psychic', i.e. 'true' Gnostics. As one Gnostic text states quite clearly, each initiate understands Jesus according to their own level of understanding. By allowing a multitude of different views they could rank followers according to their level of Gnosis. ... we never hear Gnostics say outright that someone is wrong to believe that Jesus was a man of flesh and blood, but we can imagine that they secretly thought such a person to be at the lowest level of consciousness.

My view, following Elaine Pagels' discussion in The Gnostic Paul, is that the psychic view that Jesus seemed to be a man stands below the Gnostic 'pneumatic' view that this seeming is itself an illusion, because the real identity of Christ is purely eternal.

Isis is an image of eternal purity and fertility in feminine identity. Anyone who denies the archetypal nature of Isis as virgin mother suffers a basic failure of spiritual understanding. But that is what happens when people's minds are polluted by junk.

A big part of the problem of corruption in Christianity is the political drive to emphasise patriarchal control, including the usurping of the Isis myth as the Blessed Virgin Mary, who represents female subservience within a controlled patriarchal framework, demoted from the Trinity. People who hold to the patriarchal social view of gender relations will inevitably dismiss all discussion of Isis as an autonomous and equal symbol of female power.


Thanks Robert,

I like what you have said about Gnosticism and it makes alot of sense. Have you read any of Alvin Boyd Kuhn's works? If you haven't, I think you would really enjoy them.

_________________
You can always trust a person in search of the truth, but never the one who has found it. Manly P. Hall

http://michaelsherlockauthor.blogspot.jp/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 4:17 pm 
Offline
Thor

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:06 pm
Posts: 46
GodAlmighty wrote:
michaelsherlock wrote:
The first thinks she is an ancient Egyptian worshipper of Isis, and the other loves Cheeseburgers.


Wait, she thinks she IS an ANCIENT Egyptian worshipper of Isis? Do you mean she believes in reincarnation and that she worshipped Isis in a past life or something to that effect? Or do you mean she is a modern day worshipper of an ancient goddess?


Sorry I have not responded earlier. No, she calls Isis, by the transliteration of the Egyptian, Aset/Ast and refers to her as "my goddess," claiming that no one understands "her Ast, as well as she does!" This is why I made that comment. Cheeseburger, anyone?

_________________
You can always trust a person in search of the truth, but never the one who has found it. Manly P. Hall

http://michaelsherlockauthor.blogspot.jp/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:02 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:41 pm
Posts: 738
michaelsherlock wrote:
Have you read any of Alvin Boyd Kuhn's works? If you haven't, I think you would really enjoy them.


Yes, I first heard of AB Kuhn when I read The Pagan Christ by Tom Harpur, who calls Kuhn an unsung genius.

Some of Kuhn's and Massey's books are available free on the internet at http://meuser.awardspace.com/kuhnmassey.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:13 pm 
Offline
Thor

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:06 pm
Posts: 46
Robert Tulip wrote:
michaelsherlock wrote:
Have you read any of Alvin Boyd Kuhn's works? If you haven't, I think you would really enjoy them.


Yes, I first heard of AB Kuhn when I read The Pagan Christ by Tom Harpur, who calls Kuhn an unsung genius.

Some of Kuhn's and Massey's books are available free on the internet at http://meuser.awardspace.com/kuhnmassey.html


You just reminded me. I had been meaning to buy Tom Harpur's Pagan Christ, but had completely forgot about it. Thanks for the info and the links. I have all of Massey's books, and a few of AB Kuhn's. I quote AB Kuhn in the 2nd and 3rd Volume of my series, as I agree with Tom...Unsung Genius!

_________________
You can always trust a person in search of the truth, but never the one who has found it. Manly P. Hall

http://michaelsherlockauthor.blogspot.jp/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group