Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:24 pm Posts: 4331 Location: 3rd rock from the sun
I am tempted to point out a few lies and major errors that will neutralize his blog/argument - just so others have at least some reality balance to bring their feet back on the ground ....
keith has used much of the same material from his video that has been thoroughly debunked previously in front of keith's own awareness, right here in this thread & elsewhere but, he uses them anyway. keith has no need for accuracy whatsoever. He has the lowest character & integrity of any person I've ever seen. Thanks again for much laughter, keith.
It's pretty much a waste of time though - so, I may end up just ignoring him. He has a tendency to turn-off his own fellow Christians anyway - they find him already embarrassing.
keith is probably celebrating his new blog by blasting the homoerotic Christian song "I can only imagine" by Mercy Me:
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:24 pm Posts: 4331 Location: 3rd rock from the sun
There's no response necessary from Acharya at all. She shouldn't be expected to address every uneducated punk kid who comes along - Keith thinks the "Jesus as the sun throughout history" article is all about him because he's so arrogant & conceited. The only response that may be necessary is, once again, as per usual, to point out where kt is wrong and where he continually lies like a pathological liar. There was so much that kt misunderstood that there's too many errors on his part to take the time. kt has no interest in making necessary adjustments for accuracy or honesty. Keith favors lies, smears, libel, slander and defamation over integrity, accuracy, objectivity o honesty.
And, who does he have helping him now anyway? I know he didn't write that by himself, he's incapable - he's getting help.
keith demonstrates his own insanity every time he claims Acharya has anything to do with the "elite" "Illuminati" "Freemasons" etc - he has no clue what an utter divorce from reality that concept is.
'Cause, we know all about her multimillion dollar advertising campaign - her millions of book sales and she's on the major media constantly (obvious sarcasm) - there just aren't words to describe to level of stupidity on keith's part. That's why I am hearing people call him, keith TRASH & his cult followers "TRASH HEADS."
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 5:57 am Posts: 115 Location: Warrnambool, Australia
Oh, I agree freethinka ... it's just that he has a small degree (quite small, I guess) of notice on youtube and who wants false information being spread about them.
Acharya should have her own youtube channel in my opinion, and have a video once a month or something and address a specific contention in each video (not necesarily specifically at Keith - why bother!) ... youtube is always a handy medium for disseminating honest information.
That's what I'm trying to do, Brenton; however it's difficult. Thankfully, Keith is giving me much publicity. Especially with his more recent videos ie: 'Dudekin - A Stupid Liar?'.
Even the Christian's themselves are appalled by Keith's disgraceful demeanor, so much so that he has had to release an update in the video description - asserting me to be a worker for Satan .
Frankly, I sometimes wonder why we bother? The truth will prevail eventually.
'The same lie forever told anew Will never make the falsehood true' - Gerald Massey
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:24 pm Posts: 4331 Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Acharya's put out a statement against this trash.
Quote:
Some Christian fanatics have been spreading libel, slander and assorted other falsehoods and smears against me and others. I've already addressed these issues, both in writing and on radio. Like many net rumors, these lies continue to fester among those not interested in facts and doing actual research and study for themselves. Maybe these folks only understand shouting?
I HAVE NEVER READ ANY OF ALICE BAILEY'S WORKS, NOT EVEN A PARAGRAPH. I HAVE QUOTED BLAVATSKY ONLY A FEW TIMES IN THOUSANDS OF PAGES. ALICE BAILEY HAS HAD NO INFLUENCE WHATSOEVER ON ME OR MY WORK. NOR HAS BLAVATSKY OR THEOSOPHY IN ANY SIGNIFICANT MANNER. I HAVE ALREADY PROVED THAT THE CONCEPTS I PUT FORTH IN MY WORK CAME FROM SOURCES LONG PREDATING THE ERA OF BLAVATSKY. THESE SOURCES INCLUDE NUMEROUS ANCIENT PRIMARY SOURCES AND THE WORKS OF HIGHLY CREDENTIALED MODERN AUTHORITIES IN RELEVANT FIELDS.
THESE SMEARS REPRESENT UTTER FALSEHOODS FROM RELIGIOUS FANATICS WHO CONTINUE TO IGNORE THE FACTS AND ARE WILLFULLY BEARING FALSE WITNESS BY SPREADING DEFAMATION, LIBEL AND SLANDER. THE VAST MAJORITY OF THOSE SPREADING THESE SMEARS AND LIES HAVE NEVER READ MY WORK TO ANY SIGNIFICANT DEGREE, IF AT ALL.
It's clear these individuals understand that throwing manure up against the wall is bound to stick to some degree. But, that's all it is - dung.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Enjoy your day.
Here's a follow up to Keith's video. I also brush upon Acharya's non-existent connection to Theosophy. I've included that statement just posted in the description box - so thank-you Acharya and Freethinkaluva22 for that .
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 5:57 am Posts: 115 Location: Warrnambool, Australia
You know, when I think of Keith I think of that scene with Dr. Evil expressing that really blank face and saying: "You know, you just don't get it - do you?"
Keith hasn't even studied Acharya's work. Oh, why? Because she's not 'reputable'. Hmm? And someone like KEITH gets to decide does he?
No, for these people it seems that the measure of a reputable scholar is how good they are at apologetics.
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:17 pm Posts: 2247 Location: Everywhere
Great videos for sure.
"ChelevSaRa" definitely understands Peter Joseph and the Zeitgeist movement. So many people do not. For instance I left a link on one of the Pantheist forums, thinking that some of the people would "get it", but instead I spent all of my time pulling quotes on how the Venus Project differs from communistic socialism. People don't seem to understand that the idea is to go beyond, or transcend, the systems of government and religion that we've seen in the past. It was enjoyable to listen to someone who actually "gets it" address the issue. The ZG movement is certainly not interested in a "One World Religion" in any way.
It looks like "Keith Trash" hit a brick wall recently. I think that it's good to systematically expose these apologists one by one. U-tubes "Greek Orthodoxy" took a serious rogering every which way when Acharya took his suggestion and read through Mettinger's "The Riddle of Resurrection" and basically threw it right back in his face - even to the extent of using Mettinger's work in CIE to prove the existence of the pre-christian concept of dying and rising gods, and now it seems "Keith Trash" is taking the same sort of rogering in with the release of "Jesus as the Sun Throughout History".
_________________ The Jesus Mythicist Creed: The "Jesus Christ" of the New Testament is a fictional composite of characters, real and mythical. A composite of multiple "people" is no one.
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:24 pm Posts: 4331 Location: 3rd rock from the sun
latest video by dudekin
RE: 'Critique of Acharya's Sun Thesis' Part II
Over the last several years especially since Zeitgeist came out the broad stroke generalizations against Gerald Massey have been massive by both theists and atheists. It is simply a testament to their own ignorance on the subject - as they never knew just how peer reviewed Massey was. And, just how close in contact Massey was to some of the best, highly credentialed Egyptologists of his day.
Plus, Massey's own writings utterly debunk all attempts to put him in with the theosophists, druids etc.
Now, were it not for Acharya S / D.M. Murdock bringing Gerald Massey and his work to light would anyone be talking about him at all? A very special thanks goes to Acharya.
Quote:
"A misconception about Massey's religious beliefs stems from his connection with the Most Ancient Order of Druids to which he was elected Chosen Chief, an honorary position that he held from 1880 until 1906. The position might have involved some minor administrative duties, but it required no formal membership. To Massey, at least, it was not a religion and did not involve forms of initiation, ceremonial dress or attendance at active meetings at megalithic sites; indeed, Massey did not believe in such pagan ceremony and made his interest in the Druids plain...:
"I cannot join in the new masquerade and simulation of ancient mysteries manufactured in our time by Theosophists, Hermeneutists, pseudo-Esoterics, and Occultists of various orders, howsoever profound their pretensions. The very essence of all such mysteries as are got up from the refuse leavings of the past is pretence, imposition, and imposture. The only interest I take in the ancient mysteries is in ascertaining how they originated, in verifying their alleged phenomena, in knowing what they meant, on purpose to publish the knowledge as soon and as widely as possible." (vide Massey's response to the Blavatsky letter, Agnostic Journal, 1891).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
