Freethought Nation

presented by Acharya S and TruthBeKnown.com, online since 1995

It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 3:06 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 133 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 5:25 pm 
Offline
Dionysus

Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 280
ZeitgeistTruth wrote:
Here you made no attempt to criticize. However, if I was such a coward as Acharya S, I wouldn't have deleted the link. There is no academician that supports Zeitgeist. You are all on your own. We presented a thorough refutation and debunked your thread. You have to demonstrate why it is circular reasoning. If you don't your the one that will become the laughing stock of society.


Really? Now?



I guess this video series must be a figment of my imagination then.



I guess Robert Beckford who is an Oxford Graduate and a specialist in Archaeology, Christian Theology and Ancient Mythology really doesn't have the degrees he has... And I guess that E. A. Wallis Budge, Samuel Birch, Gerald Massey, etc... did not actually exist but are figments of my imagination.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 5:22 am 
Offline
Dionysus

Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 280
Hey guy's, writing an article in response to Keith's bs article... I'm nearly done with it. Just gotta finish it up and then proof read it for errors. I'll post it here when I am done.

Update: I am almost done, just gotta wait for an e-mail response to Dr. Noel Swerdlow about the authenticity of Keith's e-mail and opposing views. It will be up either tonight or tomorrow. Gonna catch some zzzzzzzzz's. See yah all later :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 6:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 4337
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
ZeitgeistTruth wrote:
"Here you made no attempt to criticize. However, if I was such a coward as Acharya S, I wouldn't have deleted the link. There is no academician that supports Zeitgeist. You are all on your own. We presented a thorough refutation and debunked your thread. You have to demonstrate why it is circular reasoning. If you don't your the one that will become the laughing stock of society. "

LOL, I saw no need to waste anymore time on Keith. Believe it or not there are many other far more important things for me to be doing rather than responding to the narcissist, Keith. My previous response worked just fine and still suffices since Keith's response didn't actually refute anything, he just regurgitated the same crap we've already debunked here.

BTW, your link was never removed.

I suppose I'll address a few more things when I get time. Keith and his trash has never been any sort of top priority, understand?

Feel free to give the thread ZEITGEIST Part 1 & The Supportive Evidence a good going over.

ZeitgeistTruth "There is no academician that supports Zeitgeist"

LMAO!!!

Actually, there's far more than you can imagine.

Here are just a couple 30 year scholars who have written strong positive reviews of Acharya's book which substantiates all the claims made in Zeitgeist part 1 regarding the Egyptian religion.

Christ in Egypt: Reviewed by Dr. Robert M. Price

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=2887

Archaeologist endorses 'Christ in Egypt'

_________________
2013 Astrotheology Calendar
The Mythicist Position
Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection
Stellar House Publishing at Youtube


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 6:07 pm 
Offline
Dionysus

Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 280
Hey guy's, got another video to add to the collection:



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 11:00 pm 
Offline
Dionysus

Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 280
The article is uploaded guy's. Check it out:



It's all in the video description


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 6:23 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 4337
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Responding to Keith Thompson's "Refutation of Acharya S’s followers at 'Feethought Nation'"

Zeitgeistresponds's Blog

_________________
2013 Astrotheology Calendar
The Mythicist Position
Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection
Stellar House Publishing at Youtube


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 11:28 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 7:12 pm
Posts: 8
The fact that you promote Devon Evans' article destroys all of your credibility. At this point you are no longer trying to convince the outsiders looking in, you are shoring up your own New Age faith and trying to keep those inside from leaving. Anyone with two brain cells will be able to see how horrible that response is however. I am content with letting the readers read both replies and judge for themselves because of how weak this last article of yours is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 12:00 pm 
Offline
Dionysus

Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 280
ZeitgeistTruth wrote:
The fact that you promote Devon Evans' article destroys all of your credibility. At this point you are no longer trying to convince the outsiders looking in, you are shoring up your own New Age faith and trying to keep those inside from leaving. Anyone with two brain cells will be able to see how horrible that response is however. I am content with letting the readers read both replies and judge for themselves because of how weak this last article of yours is.


First off, what New Age faith do I have? I am an Atheist... how the f**k can an Atheist have Faith in any particular belief? Secondly, New age believes such as Psychic powers, Homeopathy, Channeling Spirits, etc... to me are just as ridiculous if not more than the concept of a dying and rising savior for the sins of mankind. Finally, why is this article "weak" and "horrible?" You do not indicate why, you do not say why, you don't even explain why; your entire argument is "it's horrible because I say it is." Please offer substance other than personal attacks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Achrya S
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 12:00 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 7:12 pm
Posts: 8
Why did Acharya S (new ager) decline to debate Dr. Michael Licona? Why did she refuse to debate yet respond to his critique of her book? She isn't afraid to take on scholars is she?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Devon Embarrassed Again
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 12:03 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 7:12 pm
Posts: 8
Devon,

Have fun:
Code:
http://www.keithtruth.com/critique_of_acharya_s_sun_thesis.html


Your article was destroyed before it was written.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Devon Destroyed Again
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 12:10 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 7:12 pm
Posts: 8
“This is completely irrelevant to my article. The ‘refutation of the Acharya S’ you put forth have NOTHING to do with my article. My article was in response to Keith Thompson (aka KeithTruth). If you cannot refute my article and only attack my character then you have no argument and everything else you say unless it is in direct response to my article is not even noteworthy of response.”

Really?!

I am content with letting the readers read both replies and judge for themselves because of how weak this last article of yours is. By the way Devon, new age faith was a reference to Luva who believes in the NEW AGE of aquarius. That is what makes a new ager a new ager - they don't necessarely have to believe in channeling, etc. but many do idiot.


Luva, why do you promote the writings of a racist?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTm5OLiH3_s


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Achrya S
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 12:19 pm 
Offline
Dionysus

Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 280
ZeitgeistTruth wrote:
Why did Acharya S (new ager) decline to debate Dr. Michael Licona? Why did she refuse to debate yet respond to his critique of her book? She isn't afraid to take on scholars is she?


Um... Mike Licona, like Gary Habermas are apologists. They ascertain that resurrection of historical fact and they say all scholars agree. When the reality is that EVERY SCHOLAR I HAVE TALKED TO STATED THAT IT IS A MATTER OF FAITH, SECULAR OR OTHERWISE. People who think Mike Licona is an historian might as well think that Hitler was a Saint. I know I am enacting Godwin's law here but I thought he would be a good example of why Mike Licona is not an historian.

I never knew she "declined" a debate with him. When was this exactly and can you provide proof of it for me?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 12:22 pm 
Offline
Dionysus

Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 280
ZeitgeistTruth wrote:
Devon,

Have fun:
Quote:
http://www.keithtruth.com/critique_of_acharya_s_sun_thesis.html


Your article was destroyed before it was written.


Funny you should mention that one, I was actually going to respond to that one next. I just need the book's in my possession (I tend to be picky about having the physical books as opposed to online versions). Look forward towards another article. But at any rate this is irrelevant, this has nothing to do with my post at all. The article was in response DIRECTLY to a recent article of Keith's. It doesn't matter this article as it was not a response to it. You might as well just throw feces at me in response my article cause it has NOTHING to do with it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 12:51 pm 
Offline
Dionysus

Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 280
ZeitgeistTruth wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTm5OLiH3_s

Have fun!


Again this has nothing to do with my original article and you have not provided any reason why my article is bunk, your entire argument is circular.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 1:55 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 4337
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
So, ZeitgeistTruth is another Keith Thompson sock-puppet account. Why didn't you just use your other sock-puppet account Keith? Your "john davis" account is still up. Anyway, Keith, you're free to post but you're not going to bring in all your trash to dump here.

Keith/ZeitgeistTruth wrote:
"The fact that you promote Devon Evans' article destroys all of your credibility. At this point you are no longer trying to convince the outsiders looking in, you are shoring up your own New Age faith and trying to keep those inside from leaving. Anyone with two brain cells will be able to see how horrible that response is however. I am content with letting the readers read both replies and judge for themselves because of how weak this last article of yours is."

Actually, Devon did a fine job of proving you to be a pathological liar for the Lord, Keith. That probably is difficult for you to swallow. Thus, your desperate knee-jerk reactions to it and my previous response here. People with basic common sense will easily see through your load of crap, Keith. Get a job, Keith.

Keith/ZeitgeistTruth wrote:
"Why did Acharya S (new ager) decline to debate Dr. Michael Licona? Why did she refuse to debate yet respond to his critique of her book? She isn't afraid to take on scholars is she?"

LMAO!!! Another Keith TRASH lie. Acharya has NEVER been invited to debate Mike Licona.

_________________
2013 Astrotheology Calendar
The Mythicist Position
Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection
Stellar House Publishing at Youtube


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 133 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group