As explained to KD8 for over two years now throughout this thread, we'd have to essentially write a book explaining everything at an almost elementary level
All it would take is about a dozen pieces of evidence, which would not take a book's-length text to present. Pretending it would be an unreasonably daunting task to present these dozen-or-so pieces of evidence is just one way of avoiding having to present it. Quote the story where it happened. Show me where the university-level scholar agreed to it. Show me the article in the peer-reviewed journal where the parallel passed. It's not that difficult, and wouldn't take up much space. All I'm asking is for HALF the claims for a SINGLE deity. How on Earth could it be as difficult as you're suggesting?
KD8 has refused to read these books for 8 years now, yet, he STILL has the temerity to make such demands as we need to cater to him by presenting him with all the evidence that would be much easier for him to read for himself.
If the books had the evidence, yes. But the inability of the mythicists to present the evidence, despite having those books themselves, convinces me that the evidence is not in them. If it does, prove me wrong by presenting it. Again, half the claims for one deity isn't that difficult, if the evidence actually exists.
KD8 has absolutely no relevant credentials or qualifications to speak of so what exactly does KD8 think he's going to do with all this information?
Post it to my website for all to see, of course.
All of these points have been thoroughly explained in excruciating detail throughout this thread many, many times yet, KD8 still doesn't get it. KD8 omits all the times he's been proven wrong here and his errors yet, he comes back to post again as if it never happened.
That's because you've all done everything except present the evidence for at least half of the claims for a single deity, which is all I was asking. If you'd just done it right up front, it would have been a lot quicker and easier than giving excuses as to why you won't do so.
Presenting the evidence isn't the difficult part - it's explaining it to KD8 so even he can understand it.
If people were presenting the evidence and I was failing to understand it, then maybe you'd have a point. But the problem isn't in my failure to understand the evidence, it's in the inability of mythicists to even present it in the first place. Pretending that I wouldn't understand the evidence is yet another way to avoid having to present it.
I guess KD8 is just in need of more attention and wants to waste our time by going down this road again.
No, I just happened to visit and saw Tat's claim to have the evidence, so I'm asking her to present it. If she wants to admit she does not, I'll gladly leave. Or if she wants to go ahead and present it, then we'll finally get somewhere. If she needs a little time to put it together, I'll gladly walk away until she does. I'm just interested in seeing if she really does have it or not. Obviously, I would need to see it and not just take her word for it.